Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:53:42.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rejoinder to Mr. Blair

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Richard H. Perkinson
Richard H. Perkinson*
Affiliation:
St. Louis University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
PMLA , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 1933 , pp. 299 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “The Faerie Queene and its Critics,” in Essays and Studies by Members of the English Association, (Oxford Clarendon Press, 1926) xii, 67.—I instanced his analysis of the structure [Mr. Blair has ignored it], which is in agreement with Mr. Greenlaw's opinion. He examined the text for “plot,” did not try to fit theories or possibilities to it.

2 “The Plot of the Faerie Queen,” PMLA, xlvii, (1932), 84.

3 Ibid., p. 85.

4 Cf. Notcutt, loc. cit., p. 69.