Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2020
A number of critics have commented upon Holden Caulfield's “neurosis,” but none has accepted Salinger's apparent invitation to a psychoanalytical reading of the novel. As a step in that direction, this paper examines a structural pattern of aggression and withdrawal, largely sexual, in Holden's thoughts and actions. The pattern is reinforced by such characters as Stradlater and Ackley, the former mirroring Holden's mostly fanciful exploitativeness and the latter his more natural tendencies toward retrogression. The episodic middle chapters show Holden vacillating desperately between those tendencies; and the conflict is brought to a curious resolution in the concluding Phoebe section when Holden verges, or rather unconsciously fears he may be verging, on sexual intimacy with his younger sister. The two tendencies converge at that point, and Holden becomes potentially both sexually exploitative and retrogressive. It is this revelation, realized most fully through the writing of his narrative, that points the way to health.
Note 1 in page 1074 J. D. Salinger, The Catcher in the Rye (Boston: Little, 1951), pp. 7–8. Page numbers from this edition will be cited in the text.
Note 2 in page 1074 Carl F. Strauch, “Kings in the Back Row: Meaning through Structure—A Reading of Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye” in Wisconsin Studies in Contemporary Literature, 2 (Winter 1961), 5–30; rpt. in // You Really Want to Know: A Catcher Casebook (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1962), p. 104.
Note 3 in page 1074 Salinger may be echoing Phoebus rather than Phoebe, the personification of the moon; but he also may have in mind an antithesis between “Sunny” and Phoebe, the cool and chaste.