Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:40:52.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Profession and George

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

William Riley Parker
William Riley Parker*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This privilege of speaking my mind to you tonight was earned, not by distinguished scholarship, but by my serving you as Executive Secretary and Editor for nine busy years. Milton, therefore, will not be with us at this hour. Instead I invite you to ponder with me one of the most urgent problems that our profession faces: let us call it the problem of George. I am not, of course, referring to my able successor, George Winchester Stone. Our George, as you must have guessed, is the not so able fellow we let do the necessary jobs that we consider unworthy of our own attention.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , March 1960 , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An address delivered at the 74th annual meeting of the MLA, in Chicago, 28 Dec. 1959.

References

1 Younger members of the Association should realize that many other distinguished scholars have given precious time to professional activity. The above roster was meant to be illustrative only; a number of additional names come easily to mind: Albert C. Baugh, Dorothy Bethurum, Ruth J. Dean, William C. DeVane, J. Milton French, Margaret Gil-man, A. R. Hohlfeld, H. Carrington Lancaster, Sturgis E. Leavitt, Kemp Malone, Albert H. Marckwardt, Marjorie Nicolson, William A. Nitze, Ernest J. Simmons, Henry Nash Smith, Robert E. Spiller, Willard Thorp. A full, documented list might destroy the canard that productive scholars are ipso facto uninterested in professional problems. Nearer the truth is the charge that they tend to be uninterested in such problems on the state and local level, where their leadership is increasingly needed. —W.R.P.