No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2020
If I undertake to describe the language program of the Department of Modern Languages and Literatures at Princeton (as distinguished from work in non-European languages done there under other auspices) it is not in the belief that it embodies anything revolutionary or radically different in organization from that of any similar institution. If there is any virtue in such a description it lies rather in our having been able, with only a moderate degree of additional expense and dislocation, to adapt the traditional pattern to meet a reasonable modern standard.
This is the third in a series of articles written at the invitation of the Editor of PMLA in connection with the Association's FL Program. The first article, William G. Moulton's “The Cornell Language Program,” appeared in the Oct. 1952 PMLA; the second article, Leon Dostert's “The Georgetown Institute Language Program,” appeared in the April 1953 PMLA. The present article is by the director of Princeton's language courses. In presenting these articles for the information of members and of other readers of PMLA, the Editor does not necessarily endorse the views expressed therein.
1 “The Cornell Language Program,” PMLA, LXVII, vi (Oct. 1952), 38–46.