Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:24:15.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Of Work and Leisure: Digital World's Fairs and the Active Fairgoer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

Since the publication of simulacres et simulation (1981), Jean Baudrillard's analyses of technologically advanced societies as existing in a state of hyperreality—a condition marked by the alleged inability of our collective consciousness to differentiate reality from the simulation of reality—have inspired both caustic criticism and zealous support. One of Baudrillard's most famous dicta, the assertion that shopping malls, theme parks, and video games have produced “sublimations” of a real without origin or density, suspended in a condition of “hallucinatory resemblance” to itself, generated apocalyptic conclusions: we, postmodern denizens of the hyperreal, have become inept at experiencing and interpreting the world, which has been emptied of meaning (Simulations 23). In Travels in Hyperreality, Umberto Eco mirrored Baudrillard's posture but avoided the caustic pessimism Baudrillard displayed when, for example, he argued that the replicas of settings in the United States at Disneyland are more real than their real-world counterparts, with the consequence that America has become “more and more like Disneyland” (Best and Kellner, Postmodern Theory 119). In Europe as well as the United States, we were told that we lived in a world doomed to inertia and entropy, where all distinct hermeneutical systems and stable theories of knowledge had dissolved into a vaporous vacuum without substance and depth.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Aimone, Linda. “Nel segno della continuità: Le prime esposizioni nazionali a Torino (1884 e 1898).” Tra scienza e tecnica: Le esposizioni torinesi nei documenti dell'archivio Amma: 1829–1898. Ed. Bassignana, Pier Luigi. Turin: Allemandi, 1992. 147–67. Print.Google Scholar
Al villaggio e al castello medioevali.” Torino e l'esposizione italiana del 1884: Cronaca illustrata della esposizione nazionale-industriale ed artistica del 1884. Turin: Roux e Favale; Milan: Treves, 1884. 5960. Print.Google Scholar
Antonini, Maria Cristina. “Le attrazioni alle reunite.” Milano 1894: Le esposizioni riunite. Milan: Silvana. 1994. 4552. Print.Google Scholar
Arcari, Paolo. “Concludendo: 1989–1911–19….” Le esposizioni del 1911 a Torino, Roma, Firenze: Rassegna illustrata delle mostre indette nelle tre capitali per solennizzare il cinquantenario del regno d'Italia. Ed. Treves, Guido. Milan: Treves, 1911. 431–32. Print.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. Forget Foucault. New York: Semiotext(e), 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities. New York: Semiotext(e), 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. Simulations. Trans. Foss, Paul, Patton, Paul, and Beitchman, Philip. New York: Semiotext(e), 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Paris, Capital of the Nineteenth Century.” Reflections, Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. By Benjamin. Ed. Peter Demetz. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. New York: Schocken, 1978. 146–62. Print.Google Scholar
Best, Steven, and Kellner, Douglas. Postmodern Theory: Critical Interpretations. New York: Guilford, 1991. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, Steven, and Kellner, Douglas. The Postmodern Turn. New York: Guilford, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Debord, Guy. La societé du spectacle. Paris: Champ Libre, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. La definizione dell'arte. Milan: Mursia, 1968. Print.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. Travels in Hyperreality: Essays. Trans. Weaver, William. San Diego: Harcourt, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Esposizione internazionale di Milano Aprile–Novembre 1906: Guida e pianta. Milan: Società editrice fotoeliografica, 1906. Print.Google Scholar
Francis, David Rowland. The Universal Exposition of 1904. Saint Louis: Louisiana Purchase Exposition, 1913. Print.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Ed. and trans. Linge, David E. Berkeley: U of California P, 1976. Print.Google Scholar
Gozzano, Guido. “Il dono della meraviglia.” Cara Torino. Piemonte: Viglongo, 1975. 195–97. Print.Google Scholar
In che cosa la mostra di Palermo differirà da quella di Milano e di Torino.” Palermo e l'Esposizione nazionale del 1891–92. Cronaca illustrata. Milan: Treves, 1982. 10. Print.Google Scholar
Innis, Harold. Empire and Communications. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1972. Print.Google Scholar
Kroker, Arthur. Technology and the Canadian Mind. New York: St. Martin's, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Kroker, Arthur. “What to Make of Thought?Canadian Interviews. Canadian Interviews Publishing, 17 July 2009. Web. 1 Jun. 2012.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. “Catholic Humanism and Modern Letters.” Christian Humanism in Letters. Hartford: Saint Joseph's Coll., 1954. 6779. Print.Google Scholar
“1861.” L'esposizione di Torino 1911: Giornale ufficiale illustrate dell'esposizione internazionale delle industrie e del lavoro 15 Jan. 1910: 1–3. Print.Google Scholar
Moriondo, Carlo. Torino 1911: La favolosa esposizione. Turin: Piazza, 1981. Print.Google Scholar
Pavoni, Rosanna, and Selvafolta, Ornella. “Milano 1894: Le esposizioni riunite.” Milano 1884: Le esposizioni riunite. Milan: Silvana, 1994. 720. Print.Google Scholar
Turin 1911: The World's Fair in Italy. Inst. for Advanced Technologies in the Humanities, U of Virginia, 2009. Web. 2 June 2012.Google Scholar
Turin: The Nation's Birthplace and a World's Fair's Home.” Turin 1911: The World's Fair in Italy. Inst. for Advanced Technologies in the Humanities, U of Virginia, 2009. Web. 2 June 2012.Google Scholar