Article contents
Negotiation and New Historicism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2020
Abstract
The rhetoric and the models of social process that inform much of the work of new historicists and cultural materialists in the field of English Renaissance studies are governed by a subversion-containment binarism. While conceptualizations of the operations of power based on this binarism (and its underlying Foucauldian vocabulary) have generated important insights, it may prove useful to reconceive conflict as negotiation, exchange, and accommodation. The Elizabethan English constable, representing a flexible deployment of power, offers us an alternative to repressive masters and subversive peasants. His role in Shakespearean drama and his characteristic malapropisms suggest that aristocrats and common folk were together enmeshed in what Anthony Giddens calls a “dialectic of control”.
- Type
- Special Topic: The Politics of Critical Language
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1990
References
Works Cited
- 4
- Cited by