No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Natural Supernaturalism in The Tempest
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2020
Extract
“Poets are always entitled to a royalty on whatever we find in their works.” James Russell Lowell, himself a poet of sorts, was perhaps not entirely disinterested in making this observation. But a host of critics and students have accepted it at face value and have busied themselves in a hunt for the treasures which Shakespeare buried in The Tempest. The tools with which they work are mysterious and inexact; so, often, are their findings. Nothing daunted, they have advanced beyond the field of mere facts and sources in a search for treasures of another class—those which can be dug out of The Tempest, and which are of a metal and minting that Shakespeare himself might scarcely recognize.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1932
References
1 Konrad Meier, “Über Shakespeares Sturm,” in Die Neueren Sprachen, (Marburg 1907–1908); xv, 335 f.
2 H. Richter, “Shakespeare, der naturalist des übernatürlichen,” in Englische Studien (Leipzig, 1910), xlii, 367.
3 S. T. Coleridge, Biographia Literaria, Chapter xiv.
4 Arthur Golding's translation of Ovid's Metamorphoses, vii, 197–219.
5 Thomas Carlyle, Sartor Resartus, Book iii, Chapter 8. It was Carlyle's phrase that originally provided the title of this essay. He himself must have had The Tempest in mind, for he closes his chapter by quoting Prospero.
6 Edward Dowden, Shakspere, His Mind and Art, Chapter VIII.