Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:45:33.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Modernity of Western Tragedy: Genealogy of a Developing Anachronism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Hugh Grady
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the shift from modernist, formalist, and old historicist methodologies of mid-twentieth-century criticism, tragedy has been a problematic term. In the earlier age of the American New Critics and their British analog F. R. Leavis, it was one of the classic instances of a “timeless” literary category that embodied the “news that stays news” that Ezra Pound thought epitomized the literary. Tragedy was an example par excellence of a genre tied to a permanent human condition—death. As such, however, it was also largely taken for granted in the practice of the New Critics, American and British—one of the large-scale literary categories that could be safely ignored in favor of the strategies of close reading and detecting complex ironies. At times the whole project of defining a larger genre was simply ruled out of order. Kenneth Muir spoke for many in this critical generation when he wrote, “There is no such thing as Shakespearean tragedy. There are only Shakespearean tragedies” (12).

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 129 , Issue 4: Special Topic Tragedy , October 2014 , pp. 790 - 798
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Benjamin, Walter. The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Trans. Osborne, John. London: New Left, 1977. Print.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Paris, the Capital of the Nineteenth Century.” The Writer of Modern Life: Essays on Charles Baudelaire. Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard UP, 2006. 30–45. Print.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Understanding Brecht. Trans. Bostock, Anna. London: Verso, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C. Shakespearean Tragedy. 1904. New York: Meridian, 1955. Print.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Rebecca, ed. A Companion to Tragedy. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Rebecca. “The Fall of Princes: The Classical and Medieval Roots of Renaissance English Tragedy.” Bushnell, Companion 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollimore, Jonathan. Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology, and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. Sweet Violence: The Idea of the Tragic. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Eden, Kathy. “Aristotle's Poetics: A Defense of Tragic Fiction.” Bushnell, Companion 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, Hugh. “Presentism, Walter Benjamin, and the Search for Meaning in King Lear.” Shakespeare and the Meaning of Life. Spec. issue of Shakespeare: A Journal 5.2 (2009): 145–60. Print.Google Scholar
Grady, Hugh. Shakespeare and Impure Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, Hugh. “Thinking Shakespearean Tragedy in the Late Twentieth Century”. In-Between 8.1 (1999): 11–25. Print.Google Scholar
Grady, Hugh. “Tragedy and Materialist Thought.” Bushnell, Companion 128–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Edith. “Is There a Polis in Aristotle's Poetics?” Tragedy and the Tragic: Greek Theatre and Beyond. Ed. Silk, M. S. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996. 295–309. Print.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor. Dialectic of Enlightenment. 1944. Trans. Cumming, John. New York: Continuum, 1972. Print.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Hamburg Dramaturgy. Trans. Zimmern, Helen. New York: Dover, 1962. Print.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. Soul and Form. Trans. Bostock, Anna. Cambridge: MIT P, 1974. Print.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. Trans. Bostock, Anna. Cambridge: MIT P, 1974. Print.Google Scholar
Lupton, Julia Reinhard, and Reinhard, Kenneth. After Oedipus: Shakespeare in Psychoanalysis. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Marchand, Suzanne L. “1768, June 8: Johann Joachim Winckelmann Is Murdered in Trieste: Becoming Greek.” A New History of German Literature. Ed. Wellbery, David W. and Ryan, Judith. Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard UP, 2004. 376–81. Print.Google Scholar
Moses, Stéphane. “Walter Benjamin and Franz Rosenzweig.” Benjamin: Philosophy, Aesthetics, History. Ed. Smith, Gary. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1989. 228–46. Print.Google Scholar
Muir, Kenneth. Shakespeare's Tragic Sequence. 2nd ed. Liverpool: Liverpool UP, 1979. Print.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Birth of Tragedy. The Birth of Tragedy and The Case of Wagner. Trans. Kaufmann, Walter. New York: Random, 1967. 15–144. Print.Google Scholar
Rocco, Christopher. Tragedy and Enlightenment: Athenian Political Thought and the Dilemmas of Modernity. Berkeley: U of California P, 1997. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, Christiane. “Greek Tragedy and Ritual.” Bushnell, Companion 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taxidou, Olga. Tragedy, Modernity, and Mourning. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Modern Tragedy. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1966. Print.Google Scholar