Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:55:56.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modernist Maneuverings in the Marriage Plot: Breaking Ideologies of Gender and Genre in James's The Golden Bowl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Joseph A. Boone
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The power of novelistic tradition to translate ideological structures of belief into narrative structures that encode and perpetuate those beliefs is ominously illustrated in the Anglo-American novel's “marriage tradition.” Novelists who have attempted to escape such strictures have had to contend not only with the socially conservative thematics of the traditional love plot but also with its highly codified, closed structural variants. The protomodernist experimentation and formal openness of The Golden Bowl provides a case in point: here James methodically explodes the premises of traditional love fiction by making the novel's experiments in form mirror its unsettling critique of the sexual codes engendering marital strife. In the process, James's attempt to plot the contradictions inherent in the conventional ideal of wedlock underscores the degree to which a traditional novelistic pattern of happy endings has always been a self-subverting literary enterprise.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , May 1986 , pp. 374 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adams, Robert. Strains of Discord: Studies in Literary Openness. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1958.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” Lenin and Philosophy. Trans. Brewster, Ben. London: NLB, 1971. 121–73.Google Scholar
Baym, Nina. “Revision and Thematic Change in The Portrait of a Lady.” Modern Fiction Studies 22 (1976): 183–200.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe C. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. New York: Harcourt, 1958.Google Scholar
Boone, Joseph Allen. “Wedlock as Deadlock and Beyond: Closure and the Victorian Marriage Ideal.” Mosaic 17 (1984): 65–81.Google Scholar
Boumelha, Penny. Thomas Hardy and Women: Sexual Ideology and Narrative Form. 1982. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1985.Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter. “Freud's Masterplot: Questions of Narrative.” Literature and Psychoanalysis. The Question of Reading: Otherwise. Ed. Felman, Shoshana. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1982. 280–300.Google Scholar
Calder, Jenni. Women and Marriage in Victorian Fiction. London: Thames, 1976.Google Scholar
Cockshut, A. O. J. Man and Woman: A Study of Love and the Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Craig, David M. “The Indeterminacy of the End: Maggie Verver and the Limits of Imagination.” Henry James Review 3 (1982): 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Sara deSaussure. “Feminist Sources in The Bostonians.” American Literature 50 (1978-79): 570–87.Google Scholar
Dupee, F. W. Henry James. Garden City: Doubleday, 1951.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. Criticism and Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory. 1976. London: Verso, 1978.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1983.Google Scholar
Fernando, Lloyd. “New Women” in the Late Victorian Novel. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Fetterley, Judith. The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Forster, E. M. Aspects of the Novel. 1927. New York: Harcourt, 1966.Google Scholar
Friedman, Alan. The Turn of the Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 1966.Google Scholar
Garrett, Peter. The Victorian Multiplot Novel: Studies in Dialogical Form. New Haven: Yale UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Girard, René. Deceit, Desire, and the Novel: Self and Other in Literary Structure. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1965.Google Scholar
Habegger, Alfred. Gender, Fantasy, and Realism in American Literature. New York: Columbia UP, 1982.10.7312/habe91268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrum, Jean H. Sex and Sensibility: Ideal and Erotic Love from Milton to Mozart. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1980.Google Scholar
Haller, William, and Haller, Malleville. “The Puritan Art of Love.” Huntington Library Quarterly 5 (1941-42): 235–72.Google Scholar
Heilbrun, Carolyn. “Marriage Perceived: English Literature 1873-1941.” What Manner of Woman: Essays on English and American Life and Literature. Ed. Springer, Marlene. New York: New York UP, 1977. 160–83.Google Scholar
Hinz, Evelyn J. “Hierogamy versus Wedlock: Types of Marriage Plots and Their Relationship to Genres of Prose Fiction.” PMLA 91 (1976): 900–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmstrom, John, and Lerner, Laurence, eds. George Eliot and Her Readers: A Selection of Contemporary Reviews. London: Bodley, 1966.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Golden Bowl. 1904. 2 vols. New York: Scribner's, 1922.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Notebooks of Henry James. Ed. Matthiessen, F. O. and Murdoch, Kenneth B. New York: Oxford UP, 1947.Google Scholar
James, Henry. Theory of Fiction: Henry James. Ed. James E. Miller, Jr. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1972.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank. The Sense of an Ending. New York: Oxford UP, 1970.Google Scholar
Kiely, Robert. Beyond Egotism: The Fiction of James Joyce, Virginia Woolf, and D. H. Lawrence. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A. Narrative and Its Discontents: Problems of Closure in the Traditional Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. “The Problematic of Ending in Narrative.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 33 (1978): 3–7.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy. “Emphasis Added: Plots and Plausibilities in Women's Fiction.” PMLA 96 (1981): 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moers, Ellen. “Women's Liberator.” Rev. of Samuel Richardson: A Biography, by T. C. Eaves and Ben D. Kimpel. New York Review of Books 10 Feb. 1972: 27–31.Google Scholar
Niemtzow, Annette. “Marriage and the New Woman in The Portrait of a Lady.” American Literature 47 (1975-76): 377–95.Google Scholar
Richter, David H. Fable's End: Completeness and Closure in Rhetorical Fiction. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1974.Google Scholar
Rougement, Denis de. Love and the Western World. Trans. Belgion, Montgomery. Greenwich: Fawcett, 1956.Google Scholar
Sacks, Sheldon. Fiction and the Shape of Belief: A Study of Henry Fielding (with Glances at Swift, Johnson, and Richardson). Berkeley: U of California P, 1964.Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert, and Kellogg, Robert. The Nature of Narrative. New York: Oxford UP, 1966.Google Scholar
Sears, Sallie. The Negative Imagination: Form and Perspective in the Novels of Henry James. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1963.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Sklenicka, Carol J. “Henry James's Evasion of Ending in The Golden Bowl.” Henry James Review 4 (1982): 50–60.Google Scholar
Staves, Susan. Players' Scepters: Fictions of Authority in the Restoration. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1979.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. The Crisis of the Aristocracy, 1558-1641. Oxford: Clarendon, 1965.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Patricia. Women and Fiction: Feminism and the Novel 1880-1920. Sussex: Harvester, 1979.Google Scholar
Tanner, Tony. Adultery in the Novel: Contract and Transgression. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Torgovnick, Marianna. “Gestural Pattern and Meaning in The Golden Bowl.” Twentieth Century Literature 26 (1980): 455–56.Google Scholar
Veeder, William. Henry James—The Lessons of the Master: Popular Fiction and Personal Style in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1975.Google Scholar
Ward, J. A. The Search for Form: Studies in the Structure of James's Fiction. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1967.Google Scholar
Watt, Ian. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding. Berkeley: U of California P, 1964.Google Scholar
Wright, Walter. “Maggie Verver: Neither Saint nor Witch.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 12(1957): 59–71.Google Scholar
Yeazell, Ruth. Language and Knowledge in the Late Novels of Henry James. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1976.Google Scholar