Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:22:45.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Milton, Paradise Regained, and Georgic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Anthony Low
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the question of genre has puzzled critics of Paradise Regained, the poem's structure, style, and spirit, as well as much of its imagery, are georgic. Like Vergil, Milton emphasizes incessant labor, constructive as opposed to destructive heroism, and quiet effort to build a flourishing civilization. In the Georgics as in the Bible, the right response to the curse of labor transforms it into a blessing. While epic glorifies war, georgic celebrates the arts of peace. In Paradise Lost, Adam and Eve enjoy a pastoral paradise of ease until they fall; then they and their descendants must earn their bread in a hard georgic world. In Paradise Regained, Satan variously attempts to pervert the generic mode of the Son's heroism. After a laborious struggle, the Son confirms himself in the role anticipated by Milton's opening metaphor: he raises a georgic garden in the world's “wast Wilderness.”

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 98 , Issue 2 , March 1983 , pp. 152 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Baker, Stewart A. “Sannazaro and Milton's Brief Epic.” Comparative Literature 20 (1968): 116–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, Patrick. Infernal Triad. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. New York: Pantheon, 1953.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Giles. Christs Victorie and Triumph. London, 1610.Google Scholar
Freeman, James A. Milton and the Martial Muse. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. “The Typology of Paradise Regained.” Modern Philology 53 (1956): 227–38.Google Scholar
Hill, John Spencer. John Milton: Poet, Priest, and Prophet. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Merritt Y., ed. Complete Poems and Major Prose. By John Milton. New York: Odyssey, 1957.Google Scholar
Jordan, Richard Douglas. “Paradise Regained and the Second Adam.” Milton Studies 9 (1976):261–76.Google Scholar
Knott, John R. Milton's Pastoral Vision. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara K. Milton's Brief Epic. Providence: Brown Univ. Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. Day, trans. The Georgics of Virgil. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Low, Anthony. “The Unity of Milton's Elegia Sexta.” English Literary Renaissance 11 (1981): 213–23.Google Scholar
MacKellar, Walter, ed. Paradise Regained. Vol. 4 of A Variorum Commentary on the Poems of John Milton. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Martz, Louis L. Poet of Exile. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Miles, Gary B. Virgil's Georgics. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Milton, John. The Works of John Milton. Ed. F. A. Patterson et al. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1931–40.Google Scholar
Pecheux, Mother M. Christopher. “Milton and Kairos.” Milton Studies 12 (1979): 197–211.Google Scholar
Pope, Elizabeth M. Paradise Regained: The Tradition and the Poem. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Putnam, Michael C. J. Virgil's Poem of the Earth. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Puttenham, George. The Arte of English Poesie. London, 1589; facsim. ed., Kent, Ohio: Kent State Univ. Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Henry. Mythomystes (1632). In Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century. Ed. Spingarn, J. E. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1957, 141–79.Google Scholar
Safer, Elaine B. “The Socratic Dialogue and ‘Knowledge in the Making’ in Paradise Regained.” Milton Studies 6 (1974):215–26.Google Scholar
Sessions, William A. “Spenser's Georgics.” English Literary Renaissance 10 (1980): 202–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidney, Sir Philip. A Defense of Poetry. In Miscellaneous Prose of Sir Philip Sidney. Ed. Duncan-Jones, K. and van Dorsten, J. Oxford: Clarendon, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, Edward W. Milton's Poetry: Its Development in Time. Pittsburgh: Duquesne Univ. Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Tillyard, E. M. W. Milton. 1930; rpt. London: Chatto and Windus, 1966.Google Scholar
Virgil. Trans, and ed. H. Rushton Fairclough. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. The Georgics of Virgil. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1969.Google Scholar