Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:34:09.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Matthew Arnold and John Bright: A Typographical Error and Some Ironic Consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Barbara Garlitz  and
Merle M. Bevington
Barbara Garlitz
Affiliation:
Radcliffe College
Merle M. Bevington
Affiliation:
Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary
Information
PMLA , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , June 1955 , pp. 543 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Culture and Anarchy, ed. J. Dover Wilson (Cambridge, 1935), pp. 17–18.

2 Ibid., p. 217.

3 Thus in Public Addresses by John Bright, M.P ed. James E. Thorold Rogers (London, 1879), p. 62. The italics are Wilson's.

4 Times, 6 Feb. 1868; Public Addresses by James Bright, M.P., p. 62.

5 For the facts of succeeding paragraphs I depend, except where otherwise noted, upon F. W. Burstall and C. G. Burton, Souvenir History of the Foundation and Development of Mason Science College and of the University of Birmingham. 1880–1930 (Birmingham, 1930).

6 Cf. versions in Nineteenth Century, xii (Aug. 1882), 250, and in Discourses in America (London and New York, 1894), p. 132. The carefully chosen “perhaps,” “I believe,” and “I find” indicate that Arnold was more fully informed about Smith and Vassar than about Girton and Newnham.