Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:42:04.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Logic of Delegation in The Ambassadors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Julie Rivkin
Julie Rivkin*
Affiliation:
Connecticut College, New London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Strether's final gesture of renunciation, like his various attempts to live vicariously through those around him, follows from his own position of ambassador—both for Mrs. Newsome and for Henry James. The logic he invokes in the closing scene to justify his renunciation denies the ambassador any direct profits in his own person but permits him to delegate to others his desire to “live all [he] can.” This Jamesian logic of delegation conforms to the Derridean “logic of the supplement” and governs both the novel's fictional and its compositional plots of the deviation from authority and the mediation of experience. In particular, it regulates the novel's central thematic conflict between a New England theory of representation as the preservation of an original and a Parisian theory of representation as a potentially infinite dispersal of delegates without a guiding origin or authority.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 101 , Issue 5 , October 1986 , pp. 819 - 831
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Berland, Alwyn. Culture and Conduct in the Novels of Henry James. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. “The Jamesian Lie.” A Future for Astyanax. Boston: Little, 1976. 128–55.Google Scholar
Cargill, Oscar. The Novels of Henry James. New York: Macmillan, 1961.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Dissemination. Trans. Johnson, Barbara. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Edel, Leon. The Treacherous Years, 1895–1901. New York: Lippincott, 1969. Vol. 4 of The Life of Henry James. 5 vols. 1953–72.Google Scholar
Feidelson, Charles. “James and the Man of Imagination.” Literary Theory and Structure: Essays in Honor of William K. Wimsatt. Ed. Brady, Frank, Palmer, John, and Price, Martin. New Haven: Yale UP, 1973. 331–52.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana. “Turning the Screw of Interpretation.” Yale French Studies 55-56 (1977): 94–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Lawrence Bedwell. The Expense of Vision: Essays in the Craft of Henry James. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1964.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Art of the Novel: Critical Prefaces. Ed. Blackmur, Richard P. New York: Scribner's, 1934.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Notebooks of Henry James. Ed. Matthiessen, F. O. and Murdock, Kenneth P. New York: Oxford UP, 1947.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Novels and Tales of Henry James. 26 vols. New York: Scribner's, 1907–17.Google Scholar
Leyburn, Ellen Douglass. Strange Alloy: The Relation of Comedy to Tragedy in the Fiction of Henry James. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1968.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Manfred. Communities of Love and Honor in Henry James. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrman, Ralf. The Insecure World of Henry James's Fiction: Intensity and Ambiguity. New York: St. Martin's, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, Sallie. The Negative Imagination: Form and Perspective in the Novels of Henry James. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1968.Google Scholar
Wegelin, Christof. The Image of Europe in Henry James. Dallas: Southern Methodist UP, 1958.Google Scholar
Winters, Yvor. “Maule's Well: Or, Henry James and the Relation of Morals to Manners.” In Defense of Reason. Chicago: Swallow, 1947. 300–43.Google Scholar