Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:20:36.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Letter of Recommendation as Strange Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

On the one hand, the gift presents itself as a radical Other of the commodity—and therefore also of work, insofar as the latter is understood as an investment of time and energy made in the expectation of wages or profit. On the other hand, the idea of the gift seems constantly to be drawn back under the horizon of rational exchange, and to be thus endlessly re-revealed as a secret ally of both work and the Work.

—Scott Cutler Shershow, The Work and the Gift

I have put together all these details to convince you that this recommendation of mine is something out of the common.

Quae ego omnia collegi, ut intellegeres non vulgarem esse commendationem hanc meam.

—Cicero, Epistulae ad familiares, book 13

LAST FALL I FOUND IN MY OFFICE MAILBOX AN ENVELOPE FROM A SOPHOMORE ENGLISH MAJOR WHO HAD ASKED ME DURING THE SUMMER for a last-minute letter of recommendation for a scholarship competition. The envelope contained a handwritten thank-you note—and a gift certificate for a local restaurant. I e-mailed the student to thank her and to tell her that I couldn't accept the gift certificate since the letter I had written for her was part of my job as a teacher. She insisted; I insisted. She said that several teachers had turned her down before I agreed (from a hotel in Germany) to write for her. I felt rueful, as well as grateful to her for the token of gratitude that I couldn't accept. Eventually she won the debate: I accepted the printed piece of paper and took my daughters out to a free lunch.

Type
The Changing Profession
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Passeron, Jean-Claude. Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. Trans. Nice, Richard. London: Sage, 1977. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Passeron, Jean-Claude, and de Saint Martin, Monique. Academic Discourse: Linguistic Misunderstanding and Professorial Power. Trans. Teese, Richard. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Brief.” Adj. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Brief.” N. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Cicero. The Letters to His Friends / Epistulae ad familiares. Trans. Williams, W. Glynn. Bilingual ed. Vol. 3. London: Heinemann, 1929. Print. 4 vols.Google Scholar
Clark, William. Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Committee on Professional Employment: Final Report. Modern Language Association. MLA, 1997. Web. 18 July 2012.Google Scholar
Cotton, Hannah M.Mirificum Genus Commendationis: Cicero and the Latin Letter of Recommendation.” American Journal of Philology 106 (1985): 328–34. Print.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond. Trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Margaret. Afterword. Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology. Ed. Howard, Jean E. and O'Connor, Marion F. London: Routledge, 1987. 273–83. Print.Google Scholar
Groebner, Valentin. Who Are You? Identification, Deception, and Surveillance in Early Modern Europe. New York: Zone, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. “Evaluating Scholarship in the Humanities: Principles and Procedures.” ADE Bulletin 137 (2005): 1833. Web. 17 July 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Jon. Politeness and Politics in Cicero's Letters. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holquist, Michael. “Measuring the Humanities: The Slippery Slope from Assessment to Standardization.” Literary Study, Measurement, and the Sublime. Ed. Heiland, Donna and Rosenthal, Laura J. New York: Teagle Foundation, 2012. 6994. Web. 12 May 2012.Google Scholar
Hoskins, John. Directions for Speech and Style. Ed. Hudson, Hoyt H. Princeton: Princeton UP; London: Milford, 1935. Print.Google Scholar
Isocrates. “To Timotheus.” Ed. and trans. George Norlin. Perseus Collection: Greek and Roman Materials. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 May 2012.Google Scholar
Kuther, Tara. “12 Don'ts for Getting Letters of Recommendation.” About.com. New York Times, n.d. Web. 22 Aug. 2012.Google Scholar
Legal Implications of Letters of Recommendation. Huntsville: University of Alabama, Huntsville, 2002. PDF file.Google Scholar
Liu, Jing. “Intercultural Communication in Letters of Recommendation.” Journal of Intercultural Communication 13 (2007): n. pag. Web. 13 May 2012.Google Scholar
Mack, Peter. A History of Renaissance Rhetoric, 1380–1620. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2011. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makdisi, George. The Rise of Colleges: Institutions of Learning in Islam and the West. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1981. Print.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. For Derrida. New York: Fordham UP, 2009. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MLA Recommendations on Extramural Evaluations.” ADE Bulletin 147–48 (2009): 171. Web. 15 May 2012.Google Scholar
Morford, Mark. “Lipsius's Letters of Recommendation.” Self-Presentation and Social Identification: The Rhetoric and Pragmatics of Letter Writing in Early Modern Times. Ed. van Houdt, Toon et al. Leuven: Leuven UP, 2002. 183–98. Print.Google Scholar
Ohmann, Richard. English in America: A Radical View of the Profession. 1976. 2nd ed. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Michael. “Rationale.” “Forthcoming: Volume 7 (Fall 2012): Going Postcard: The Letter(s) of Jacques Derrida.” Glossator. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2012.Google Scholar
Recommend.” Vb. Entry 1. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Regard.” Vb. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Report of the MLA Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion. Modern Language Association. MLA, 2006. Web. 20 May 2012.Google Scholar
Richardson, Samuel. Letters Written to and for Particular Friends on the Most Important Occasions Directing Not Only the Requisite Style and Forms to Be Observed in Writing Familiar Letters; But How to Think and Act Justly and Prudently in the Common Concerns of Human Life. London: C. Rivington, 1741. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Web. 17 May 2012.Google Scholar
Schall, Joe. “The Ethics of Writing Recommendation Letters.” Academe Online. AAUP, May-June 2006. Web. 18 May 2012.Google Scholar
Schneider, Alison. “Why You Can't Trust Letters of Recommendation.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. Chronicle of Higher Educ., 30 June 2000. Web. 25 May 2012.Google Scholar
Shershow, Scott Cutler. The Work and the Gift. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter. Message to the author. 14 Mar. 2012. E-mail.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Robert G.Classical Epistolary Theory and the Letters of Isocrates.” Letter-Writing Manuals and Instruction from Antiquity to the Present. Ed. Poster, Carol and Mitchell, Linda C. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 2007. 720. Print. Studies in Rhetoric/Communication.Google Scholar
Vives, Juan Luis. De conscribendis epistolis. Ed. and trans. Fantazzi, Charles. Leiden: Brill, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Watkins, Evan. Work Time: English Departments and the Circulation of Cultural Value. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
White, Peter. Cicero in Letters. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar