Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T07:07:19.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lafayette's Ellipses: The Privileges of Anonymity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2021

Joan DeJean
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The space of women's writing is too often described in negative terms. In Lafayette's La Princesse de Cleves, as well as in other works by seventeenth-century French women novelists, what have been read as signs of effacement can be viewed as attempts to assume control of the fiction-making process. Thus Lafayette devised a dual authorial signature for her masterpiece; an external signature-the anonymity she used to protect her person and increase her authority-and an internal signature-her heroine's gradual determination to supervise the plot of her life and the publication of her story. Both Lafayette's choice of anonymity and the princess' renunciation of marriage and life in the world can be seen not as acts of avoidance but as affirmations of the woman writer's authority.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 99 , Issue 5 , October 1984 , pp. 884 - 902
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Allentuch, Harriet. “The Will to Refuse in the Princesse de Clèves.” University of Toronto Quarterly 44 (1975): 185–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backer, Dorothy. Precious Women. New York: Basic, 1974.Google Scholar
Baillet, Adrien. Jugemens des savans. 5 vols. 1725; rpt. New York: Olms, 1971.Google Scholar
Brody, Jules. “La Princesse de Clèves and the Myth of Courtly Love.” University of Toronto Quarterly 38 (1969): 105–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussy, Roger de Rabutin comte de. Correspondance. Ed. Lalanne, Ludovic. 6 vols. Paris: Charpentier, 1858.Google Scholar
Charnes, J.-A. de. Conversations sur la critique de La Princesse de Clèves. Ed. Weil, François et al. Tours: Univ. François Rabelais, 1973.Google Scholar
Cixous, Hélène. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Trans. Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen. Signs 1 (1976): 875–93.Google Scholar
Danahy, Michael. “Social, Sexual and Human Spaces in La Princesse de Clèves.” French Forum 6 (1981): 212–24.Google Scholar
Desjardins, Marie-Catherine [Mme de Villedieu]. Lettres et billets galants. Ed. Cuénin, Micheline. Paris: La Société d'Etude du xviie Siècle, 1975.Google Scholar
Du Marsais, César. Traité des tropes. Paris: Nouveau Commerce, 1977.Google Scholar
Plaisir, Du. Sentiments sur les lettres et sur l'histoire. Ed. Hourcade, P.. Geneva: Droz, 1975.Google Scholar
Duras, Marguerite, and Gauthier, Xavière. Les Parleuses. Paris: Minuit, 1974.Google Scholar
Fontanier, Pierre. Les Figures du discours. Paris: Flammarion, 1977.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. “Vraisemblance et motivation.” Figures II. Paris: Seuil, 1969, 71–99.Google Scholar
Godenne, René, ed. Histoire nouvelle des amours de la jeune Bélise et de Cléante. By Ferrand, Anne. Geneva: Slatkine, 1980.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Claudine. Les Voleuses de langue. Paris: Editions des Femmes, 1976.Google Scholar
Labé, Louise. Oeuvres poétiques. Paris: Club Français du Livre, 1961.Google Scholar
Lafayette, Marie-Madeleine comtesse de. Correspondance. Ed. Beaunier, A.. 2 vols. Paris: Gallimard, 1942.Google Scholar
Lafayette, Marie-Madeleine comtesse de. “Portrait de Madame la Marquise de Sévigné.” In Galerie des portraits. Ed. de Barthélémy, Edouard. Paris: Didier, 1860.Google Scholar
Lafayette, Marie-Madeleine comtesse de. La Princesse de Clèves. Ed. Adam, A.. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1966.Google Scholar
Lathuillère, Roger. La Préciosité: Etude historique et linguistique. Geneva: Droz, 1966.Google Scholar
Laugaa, Maurice. Lectures de Mme de Lafayette. Paris: Colin, 1971.Google Scholar
Lettres portugaises [attributed to Guilleragues]. Ed. Deloffre, Frédéric and Rougeot, Jacques. Paris: Garnier, 1962.Google Scholar
Lettres portugaises. Ed. Yves Florenne. Paris: Livre de Poche, 1979.Google Scholar
Lettres portugaises, lettres d'une péruvienne et autres romans d'amour par lettres. Ed. Bray, Bernard and Landry-Houillon, Isabelle. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1983.Google Scholar
Lever, Maurice. La Fiction narrative en prose au 17e siècle. Paris: CNRS, 1976.Google Scholar
Lipking, Lawrence. “Aristotle's Sister: A Poetics of Abandonment.” Critical Inquiry 10 (1983): 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotringer, Sylvère. “La Structuration romanesque.” Critique 26 (1970): 498–529.Google Scholar
Lougee, Carolyn. Le Paradis des femmes. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. “Narrative, Interpretation and Paradox: La Princesse de Clèves.” Romanic Review 72 (Nov. 1981): 383–400.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. Woman Triumphant. Oxford: Clarendon, 1977.Google Scholar
Marie de, France. Lais. Trans. E. Rickert. London, 1904.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy. “Emphasis Added: Plots and Plausibilities in Women's Fiction.” PMLA 96 (1981): 36–48.Google Scholar
Montpensier, Louise d'Orléans duchesse de. Lettres. Paris: Collin, 1806.Google Scholar
Mouligneau, Geneviève. Madame de Lafayette, romancière? Bruxelles: Univ. de Bruxelles, 1980.Google Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, C.-A. Portraits de femmes. Paris: Garnier, 1876.Google Scholar
Scudéry, Madeleine de. “De la magnificence.” In Conversations nouvelles sur divers sujets. Amsterdam: Wetstein & Desbordes, 1685.Google Scholar
Scudéry, Madeleine de. Mademoiselle de Scudéry: Sa vie et sa correspondance. Ed. Rathery, and Boutron, . Geneva: Slatkine, 1971.Google Scholar
Segrais, J. R. de. Segraisiana. La Haye, 1722.Google Scholar
Sévigné, Marie de Rabutin-Chantal marquise de. Correspondance. Ed. Duchêne, Roger. 3 vols. Paris: Gallimard, 1972.Google Scholar
Stanton, Domna. “The Ideal of ‘repos’ in 17th-Century French Literature.” L'Esprit Créateur 15 (1975): 79–104.Google Scholar
Stanton, Domna. “The Fiction of Préciosité and the Fear of Women.” Yale French Studies 62 (1982): 107–34.Google Scholar
Le Triomphe de l'indifférence. Ed. André Beaunier. Mesures (1937): 155–206.Google Scholar
Valincour, J.-B. de. Lettres à Mme la Marquise . . . sur le sujet de La Princesse de Clèves. Ed. Chupeau, Jacques et al. Tours: Univ. François Rabelais, 1972.Google Scholar
Voiture, Vincent. Lettres. Paris: Librairie des Bibliophiles, 1880.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Arnold. Fictions of the Self. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. A Room of One's Own. New York: Harcourt, 1929.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. “Anon' and ‘The Reader’: Virginia Woolf's Last Essays.” Ed. Brenda R. Silver. Twentieth Century Literature 25 (1979): 356–441.Google Scholar