Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2020
That preciosity is only a relative term will be readily endorsed by anyone who has studied the critical literature devoted to Jean Giraudoux. Some critics hurl the word as a reproach and condemnation, while others give themselves pains to plead or explain Giraudoux's case. Each, as well as the author himself, feels certain that preciosity is the word which will label and pigeon-hole him exactly; but alas, each proceeds to suggest a different nuance until the subject becomes quite confusing. The word preciosity itself suffers as many interpretations as classicism or romanticism, so a precise definition is out of the question. Originally associated with the seventeenth century arbiters of taste in language and etiquette, the term has since broadened its scope considerably. Literary historians have found it a convenient label for subtlety and refinement wherever these qualities may appear. Hence they do not mean an isolated phenomenon, but a fundamental characteristic of some minds, adapting and transforming itself according to time and place. Words such as gongorism, euphuism, concettism, conceptualism, or marivaudage are mutations or varieties of preciosity. According to popular usage, however, précieux means only précieux ridicule, synonymous with artificial or affected. In analyzing the preciosity of Jean Giraudoux from our own point of view, we shall find occasion to examine a great variety of critical opinions.
Note 1 in page 1196 Daniel and Charles Bonnefon, Les écrivains modernes de la France (Fayard, 1927). pp. 567–568.
Note 2 in page 1196 Laurence LeSage, “The Cliché Basis for Some of the Metaphors of Jean Giraudoux,” MLN, lvi (June, 1941), 436.
Note 3 in page 1196 Juliette au pays des hommes, p. 175.
Note 4 in page 1197 Ecole des Indifférents, p. 39.
Note 5 in page 1197 Elpénor, p. 25.
Note 6 in page 1197 Yves Gandon, Le démon du style (Plon, 1938), p. 140.
Note 7 in page 1197 Henri Bidou, “Parimi les livres,” Revue de Paris, xxxiii (October, 1926), 690.
Note 8 in page 1197 A. Cahuet, “Le grand prix Balzac,” L'Illustration, clx (November 11, 1922), 468.
Note 9 in page 1197 Lucien Dubech, Les chefs de file de la jeune génération (Plon-Nourrit, 1925), p. 162.
Note 10 in page 1197 Pierre Humbourg, Jean Giraudoux (Marseille: Les Cahiers du Sud, 1926).
Note 11 in page 1198 Yves Gandon, op. cit., p. 139.
Note 12 in page 1198 Ecole des indifférents, p. 114.
Note 13 in page 1198 Milton H. Stansbury, French Novelists of Today (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1935), p. 21.
Note 14 in page 1198 Marcel Azaïs, Le chemin des gardies (Nouvelle librairie nationale, 1926), p. 237.
Note 15 in page 1198 Gandon, op. cit., p. 139.
Note 16 in page 1199 Robert Brasillach, “Le théâtre de Jean Giraudoux, 1932–34,” Portraits (Plon, 1935), pp. 123–163.
Note 17 in page 1199 J. Middleton Murry, Shakespeare (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1936), pp. 233–234.
Note 18 in page 1199 René Lalou, “Univers de Jean Giraudoux,” Nouvelles littéraires, November 7, 1931, p. 2.
Note 19 in page 1199 E. Bouvier, Initiation à la littérature d'aujourd'hui (La Renaissance du Livre, 1932), p. 251.
Note 20 in page 1199 J. Prévost, “L'Esprit de Jean Giraudoux,” La Nouvelle Revue française, xli (1933), 37–52.
Note 21 in page 1199 Maurice Bourdet, Jean Giraudoux (Editions de la Nouvelle Revue critique, 1928), p. 53.
Note 22 in page 1199 “Charles-Louis Philippe,” La Nouvelle Revue française, xxix (1937), 538.
Note 23 in page 1200 Daniel Mornet, “Comment étudier les écrivains ou les ouvrages de troisième ou quatrième ordre,” Romanic Review, xxviii (1937), 206.
Note 24 in page 1200 Jean Epstein, quoted from John Charpentier, “Autour du précieux,” Mercure de France, ccxxxviii (1932), 286.
Note 25 in page 1200 F. Lefèvre, Une heure avec …, 4ième série, p. 117.
Note 26 in page 1200 A.-M. Petitjean, “Electre et Giraudoux,” Nouvelle Revue française, xlix (September, 1937), 482.
Note 27 in page 1200 Rousseaux, op. cit., p. 119.
Note 28 in page 1200 Ibid.
Note 29 in page 1201 Juliette au pays des hommes, p. 230.
Note 30 in page 1201 Elpénor, p. 117.
Note 31 in page 1201 Suzanne et le Pacifique, p. 201.
Note 32 in page 1201 Azaïs, op. cit., p. 232.
Note 33 in page 1201 J. Schlumberger, “Adorable Clio, ”La Nouvelle Revue française, xv (November 1, 1920), 785.
Note 34 in page 1201 B. Crémieux, “Aventures de Jérôme Bardini,” Ibid., xxxvi (1931), 125.
Note 35 in page 1201 P. Lafue, “Bella,” La Revue hebdomadaire, xxxv (March 4, 1926), 119.
Note 36 in page 1201 Suzanne et le Pacifique, p. 177.
Note 37 in page 1201 Crémieux, Vingtième Siècle (La Nouvelle Revue française, 1924), p. 112.
Note 38 in page 1202 Lafue, op. cit., p. 121.
Note 39 in page 1202 Bouvier, op. cit., p. 238.
Note 40 in page 1202 Fr. de Miomandre, “Essai sur l'art de lire un moderne,” Grande Revue, xc, 193–206.
Note 41 in page 1202 Juliette au pays des hommes, pp. 188–192.
Note 42 in page 1203 Judith, pp. 166–167.
Note 43 in page 1203 Jaloux, “Esprit des livres,” Nouvelles littéraires, December 20, 1930, p. 3.
Note 44 in page 1203 Marcel Thiébaut, Evasions littéraires (Gallimard, 1935), p. 17.
Note 45 in page 1203 Op. cit., and Littérature du vingtième siècle (A. Michel, 1938).
Note 46 in page 1204 A. Rouveyre, “Théâtre,” Mercure de France, ccxvi (December 15, 1929), 659.
Note 47 in page 1204 Op. cit., p. 3.
Note 48 in page 1204 “Quelques tendances générales de la littérature française contemporaine,” French Review, xii (1939), 296.