No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Is Literature Dead?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2020
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0030812900062611/resource/name/firstPage-S0030812900062611a.jpg)
- Type
- Other
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2000
References
Works Cited
Arnold, Matthew. Culture and Anarchy. Culture and Anarchy with Friendship's Garland and Some Literary Essays. Ed. Super, R.H. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1965. 85–256. Vol. 5 of The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew. “The Function of Criticism in the Present Time.” Lectures and Essays in Criticism. Ed. Super, R.H. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1962. Vol. 3 of The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew. “The Study of Poetry.” English Literature and Irish Politics. Ed. Super, R.H. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1973. 161–88. Vol. 9 of The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold.Google Scholar
Chaouli, Michel. “What Do Literary Studies Teach: A Vast Unravelling.” Times Literary Supplement 26 Feb. 1999:14–15.Google Scholar
Magnier, Denise K “Doctoral Programs Decide That Smaller Is Better.” Chronicle of Higher Education 26 Feb. 1999: A12–A14.Google Scholar
Warton, Thomas. The History of English Poetry, from the Close of the Eleventh to the Commencement of the Eighteenth Century. 4 vols. London: Dodsley, 1774.Google Scholar