Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:38:59.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction—The Materials at Hand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Topic: Varieties of Digital Humanities
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Alison Booth and Miriam Posner

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ahmed, Manan, et al. Torn Apart / Separados. Vol. 1, 2018, xpmethod.plaintext.in/torn-apart/volume/1/.Google Scholar
Archer, Jodie, and Jockers, Matthew L. The Bestseller Code: Anatomy of the Blockbuster Novel. St. Martin's Press, 2016.Google Scholar
“Charter.” Scholars' Lab, University of Virginia Library, June 2016, scholarslab.lib.virginia.edu/charter/.Google Scholar
Cohen, Daniel, and Scheinfeldt, Thomas, editors. Hacking the Academy. U of Michigan P, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croxall, Brian, et al. One Week, One Tool. Center for History and New Media, George Mason University, 2013, oneweekonetool.org/.Google Scholar
D'Ignazio, Catherine, and Klein, Lauren. Data Feminism. MIT Press Open, Nov. 2018, bookbook.pubpub.org/data-feminism.Google Scholar
Drucker, Johanna. Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Harvard UP, 2014.Google Scholar
@FolgertK (Folgert Karsdorp). “I'm thinking about developing a workshop/event/journal/community for computational research in the humanities that doesn't exclude people with profound computational skills and knowledge. Who's in?” Twitter, 16 July 2019, 12:31 p.m., twitter.com/FolgertK/status/1151167545539477504.Google Scholar
Gallon, Kim. “Making a Case for the Black Digital Humanities.” Gold and Klein [2016], pp. 4249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girava, Gerónimo. Dos libros de cosmographia. Milan, 1556.Google Scholar
Gold, Matthew K., and Klein, Lauren F., editors. Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016. U of Minnesota P, 2016, dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled/section/14b686b2-bdda-417f-b603-96ae8fbbfd0f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Matthew K., and Klein, Lauren F., editors. Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019. U of Minnesota P, 2019, dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-f2acf72c-a469-49d8-be35-67f9ac1e3a60/section/0cd11777-7d1b-4f2c-8fdf-4704e827c2c2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Graduate Certificate: Cultural Analytics.” Temple University, bulletin.temple.edu/graduate/scd/klein/culturalanalytics-certificate/#text. Accessed 18 Nov. 2019.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jessica Marie. “Markup Bodies: Black [Life] Studies and Slavery [Death] Studies at the Digital Crossroads.” Social Text, Vol. 36, No. 4, Dec. 2018, pp. 5779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Andrew, et al. “Pavilion IV Garden.” Narratives of Slavery at Jefferson's University, Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, 2016, fieldmethods.iath.virginia.edu/16SpARH5610/pavilion_iv_garden.Google Scholar
Kirschenbaum, Matthew G.What Is Digital Humanities and What's It Doing in English Departments?Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Gold, Matthew K., U of Minnesota P, 2012, pp. 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Willard. “Modeling: A Study in Words and Meanings.” A Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by Schreibman, Susan et al., Blackwell Publishing, 2004, www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/view?docld=blackwell/9781405103213/9781405103213.xml&chunk.id=ss1-3-7.Google Scholar
Noble, Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York UP, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowviskie, Bethany. “Digital Humanities in the Anthropocene.” Digital Humanities 2014 Conference, 8-12 July 2014, Lausanne, Switzerland. Bethany Nowviskie, 10 July 2014, nowviskie.org/2014/anthropocene/.Google Scholar
Posner, Miriam. “What's Next: The Radical, Unrealized Potential of Digital Humanities.” Gold and Klein [2016], pp. 3241.Google Scholar
Risam, Roopika. New Digital Worlds: Postcolonial Digital Humanities in Theory, Praxis, and Pedagogy. Northwestern UP, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satia, Priya. Empire of Guns: The Violent Making of the Industrial Revolution. Penguin Books, 2018.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ben. “How Badly Is Google Books Search Broken, and Why?” Sapping Attention, 10 Feb. 2019, sappingattention.blogspot.com/2019/02/how-badly-is-google-books-search-broken.html.Google Scholar
Shore, Daniel. Cyberformalism: Histories of Linguistic Forms in the Digital Archive. Johns Hopkins UP, 2018.Google Scholar
So, Richard Jean. “All Models Are Wrong.” PMLA, Vol. 132, No. 3, May 2017, pp. 668–73.Google Scholar
Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. 2nd ed., Beacon Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Villarroel, Carolina, et al. Recovery: Recovering the US Hispanic Literary Heritage Blog. recoveryprojectappblog.wordpress.com/. Accessed 30 Oct. 2019.Google Scholar
Visconti, Amanda. “What about Blogging Keeps Me Blogging?” Scholars' Lab, University of Virginia Library, 2 June 2019, scholarslab.lib.virginia.edu/blog/why-blogging/.Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew Norman. Scan-Ops. Andrew Norman Wilson, 2012, www.andrewnormanwilson.com/ScanOps.html.Google Scholar
Wilson, Krissy. The Art of Google Books. 2017, theartofgooglebooks.tumblr.com/.Google Scholar
“Winners of Round Four of the Digging into Data Challenge.” Digging into Data Challenge, 29 Mar. 2017, diggingintodata.org/awards/2016/news/winners-round-four-t-ap-digging-data-challenge.Google Scholar