Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:15:48.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporating the Text: Kleist's “Michael Kohlhaas”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Clayton Koelb
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kleist's “Kohlhaas,” though much admired, is also much criticized for the “subplot” concerning the gypsy woman and her prophecy. Many readers believe that Kleist spoiled his story by introducing material that is not germane to the plot's central concern. Such criticism is based on the assumption that the novella initially revolves around Kohlhaas's horses but then swerves to focus on the slip of paper containing the gypsy's prophecy. But the assumption is incorrect. The same issue is central at the beginning and at the end: the possession and interpretation of powerful documents. Even the horses themselves turn out, when examined carefully, to be stand-ins for missing papers. The prophecy material is no swerve, for it provides Kohlhaas with a document he can use to counter the power of another document (the Paßschein) that has been withheld from him. When Kohlhaas swallows the gypsy's paper, he incorporates the mysterious power that it represents. Kohlhaas thus redeems himself by means of a piece of writing just as Kleist hoped to redeem himself in the eyes of his Prussian family by producing texts like “Michael Kohlhaas.”

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 105 , Issue 5 , October 1990 , pp. 1098 - 1107
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bernd, Clifford A. “On the Two Divergent Parts of Kleist's ‘Michael Kohlhaas.‘” New York University Department of German Studies in Germanic Languages. Ed. Robert, A. Fowkes and Volkmar Sander. Reutlingen: Hultzler, 1976. 47–56.Google Scholar
Best, Otto F. “Schuld und Vergebung: Zur Rolle von Wahrsagerin und ‘Amulett’ in Kleists ‘Michael Kohlhaas.‘” GRM ns 20 (1970): 180–89.Google Scholar
Dietrick, Linda. Prisons and Idylls: Studies in Heinrich von Kleist's Fictional World. Frankfurt: Lang, 1985.Google Scholar
Ellis, John M. “Der Herr läßt regnen über Gerechte und Ungerechte: Kleist's ‘Michael Kohlhaas.‘” Monatshefte 59 (1967): 35–40.Google Scholar
Gallas, Helga. Das Textbegehren des “Michael Kohlhaas”: Die Sprache des Unbewußten und der Sinn der Literatur. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1981.Google Scholar
Goethe, Goethe Johann Wolfgang. Die Leiden des jungen Werthers. Sämtliche Werke. Ed. Max Herrmann. Vol. 16. Stuttgart: Cotta, n.d.Google Scholar
Graham, Use. Heinrich von Kleist: Word into Flesh: A Poet's Quest for the Symbol. Berlin: Gruyter, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafka, Franz. “An Imperial Message.” The Complete Stories. Ed. Nahum, N. Glatzer. New York: Schocken, 1971. 4–5.Google Scholar
Kleist, Heinrich von. Sämtliche Werke und Briefe. Ed. Sembdner, Helmut. Vol. 2. Munchen: Hanser, 1961.Google Scholar
Koelb, Clayton. Inventions of Reading: Rhetoric and the Literary Imagination. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Lange, Henrik. “Säkularisierte Bibelreminiszenzen in Kleists ‘Michael Kohlhaas.‘” Kopenhagener Germanistische Studien 1 (1969): 213–26.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. “Die Tragödie Heinrich von Kleists.” Deutsche Realisten des 19. Jahrhunderts. Bern: Aufbau, 1951.Google Scholar
Luke, David, and Reeves, Nigel, eds. and trans. The Marquise of O—and Other Stories. By Heinrich von Kleist. Harmondsworth, Eng.: Penguin, 1978.Google Scholar
Miller, Philip B., ed. and trans. An Abyss Deep Enough: Letters of Heinrich von Kleist with a Selection of Essays and Anecdotes. New York: Dutton, 1982.Google Scholar