Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T14:01:19.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impossible Genre: Reading Comprehensive Literary History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Robert Johnstone
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent comprehensive literary histories affirm their own impossibility, a gesture that once belonged to opponents of the genre. The challenge of “the impossible whole,” of course, has always influenced the design of histories of entire literary traditions, but the open avowal that the form is a project of the cultural imagination has several notable consequences. In this new understanding, for example, the histories of a given tradition answer to and provoke rather than supersede one another in sequence. Literary works cease to be pseudoevents listed to achieve the appearance of a full history; they dematerialize, and the literary historian uses their instability to maintain the discomfiting question of the relations among “history,” “literature,” and “nation.” For these reasons, the impossible genre will remain a medium of choice, and of controversy, as long as the current academic and public debate over textual, authorial, and cultural identities continues to rage.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 107 , Issue 1: Special Topic: Theory of Literary History , January 1992 , pp. 26 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Atkins, H. G German Literature through Nazi Eyes. London: Methuen, 1941.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis De Dignitate et Augmentis Scientiarum [The Advancement of Learning]. 1623. The Works of Francis Bacon. Ed. and Trans. James Spedding, R. L. Ellis, and Heath, D. D. Boston: Brown, 1858.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland Criticism and Truth. Ed. and trans. Keuneman, Katrine Pilcher. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland On Racine. Trans. Howard, Richard. New York: Performing Arts Journal, 1983.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C., et al A Literary History of England. New York: Appleton, 1948.Google Scholar
de Saint-Maur, Bénédictins Histoire literaire de la France. Vol. 1. Paris: Osmont, 1733.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan Afterword. Ideology and Classic American Literature. Ed. Bercovitch and Jehlen, Myra. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986. 418–41.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan, gen. ed. Cambridge History of American Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan “The Problem of Ideology in American Literary History.” Critical Inquiry 12 (1986): 631–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carafiol, Peter “The New Orthodoxy: Ideology and the Institution of American Literary History.” American Literature 59 (1987): 626–62.Google Scholar
Crews, Frederick “Whose American Renaissance?” New York Review of Books 27 Oct. 1988: 68–81.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul “Literary History and Literary Modernity.” Daedalus 99 (1970): 384–404.Google Scholar
De Sanctis, Francesco Storia della letteratura italiana. 1870–71. Torino: Unione Tipographico, 1973.Google Scholar
Elliott, Emory, gen. ed, Columbia Literary History of the United States. New York: Columbia UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Elliott, Emory “New Literary History: Past and Present.” American Literature 57 (1985): 611–61.Google Scholar
Frederick II, King of Prussia On German Literature. 1780. Posthumous Works of Frederic[k] II, King of Prussia. Ed. and trans. Holcroft, Thomas. Vol. 13. London: Robinson, 1789.Google Scholar
Hollier, Denis, et al., eds A New History of French Literature. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Is Literary History Obsolete? Spec. issue of New Literary History 2.1 (1970): 1–193.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Trans. Bahti, Timothy. Theory and History of Literature 2. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1982.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard Mumford The Theory of American Literature. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1948.Google Scholar
Knapp, Samuel L Lectures on American Literature. New York: Bliss, 1829.Google Scholar
Lesky, Albin A History of Greek Literature. Trans. Willis, James and de Heer, Cornelis. New York: Crowell, 1966.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg The Historical Novel. Trans. Mitchell, Hannah and Mitchell, Stanley. Lincoln: UP of Nebraska, 1983.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois “Answering the Question: What Is Postmodernism?” Trans. Regis Durand. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Bennington, Geoffrey and Massumi, Brian. Theory and History of Literature 10. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1988. 71–82.Google Scholar
Pease, Donald E “New Americanists: Revisionist Interventions into the Canon.” Boundary 2 17 (1990): 1–37.Google Scholar
Scherer, Wilhelm History of German Literature. 1883. Trans. F. C. Conybeare. 2 vols. New York: Scribner's, 1886.Google Scholar
Spiller, Robert E. Epilogue Milestones in American Literary History. Ed. Spiller. Contributions in American Studies 27. London: Greenwood, 1977. 109–10.Google Scholar
Spiller, Robert E. Epilogue “Is Literary History Obsolete?” The Third Dimension: Studies in Literary History. New York: Macmillan, 1965. 3–14.Google Scholar
Spiller, Robert E., et al Literary History of the United States. New York: Macmillan, 1948.Google Scholar
Taine, Hippolyte Histoire de la littérature anglaise. Vol. 1. Paris: Hachette, 1863.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan “History of Literature.” Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language. Ed. Ducrot, Oswald and Todorov. Trans. Porter, Catherine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1979. 144–14.Google Scholar
Tyler, Moses Coit A History of American Literature, 1607–1765. 2 vols. New York: Putnam's, 1878.Google Scholar
Ward, A. W., Waller, A. R., et al The Cambridge History of English Literature. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1907.Google Scholar
Warton, Thomas History of English Poetry in Four Volumes. 1774. Facsim. ed. New York: Johnson Reprint, 1968.Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert Structure and Society in Literary History: Studies in the History and Theory of Historical Criticism. Expanded ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Wellek, René “Evolution of Literature.” Dictionary of the History of Ideas. Ed. Wiener, Philip P. Vol. 2. New York: Scribner's, 1973. 169–16.Google Scholar
Wellek, René “The Fall of Literary History.” The Attack on Literature and Other Essays. Chapel Hill: UP of North Carolina, 1982. 64–77.Google Scholar
Wellek, René “Literary History.” Theory of Literature. Ed. Wellek and Warren, Austin. New York: Harcourt, 1949. 263–26.Google Scholar
Wendell, Barrett A Literary History of America. 1900. New York: Haskell, 1968.Google Scholar