Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:36:45.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Idea of Taste in The Eighteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

R. W. Babcock
R. W. Babcock*
Affiliation:
Wayne University, Detroit, Mich.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment and Criticism
Information
PMLA , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , September 1935 , pp. 922 - 926
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mr. Hooker also has an article in PQ for April, 1934, on “The Reviewers and the New Criticism, 1754–70,” but it is merely a cursory summary of a few reviews of some prominent critical texts produced in this period. The ideas of “Gothic” and “Genius,” for example, were aptly handled some time ago by Longueil [MLN, xxxviii (1923), 453–460] and by Kaufman [Essay in Memory of Barre Wendell (Harvard, 1926)], but Mr. Hooker mentions neither of these men. The reviews of Johnson's Preface were already developed by Raysor [MLN, xlii (1927), 1–9], but Mr. Hooker fails to give acknowledgment—he mentions Raysor casually in another connection. He would also do well to orient himself on the position of imagination in neo-classic theory by reading Mr. F. B. Kaye on Babbitt in PQ (April, 1928), p. 178, and Mr. R. S. Crane in PQ (April, 1932), p. 189.

2 Englische Studien, lxvi (1931), 279–81.

3 MP, xxix (1931), 251–252.

4 MLN, xxvii (1932), 118–120.

5 MP, xxx (Feb., 1933), 309–316.

6 The date of Burke's essay on Taste Mr. Hooker confuses twice as of 1770 and 1756 (p. 581 n). It was really prefixed to the edition of 1759.

7 Why, also, should Mr. Hooker ignore such a point of view as Mr. Havens' in “Changing Taste in the Eighteenth Century,” PMLA, xliv (June, 1929), 501–536? There is, further, such semi-popular material as E. E. Kellett's The Whirligig of Taste (Hogarth, 1929) and Fashion in Literature: A Study in Changing Taste (Routledge, 1931). And what of Mr. F. P. Chambers' The History of Taste (Columbia Univ., 1932)?

8 P. 590.

9 P. 577.

10 P. 579.

11 P. 579.

12 P. 586.

13 P. 586.

14 P. 580.

15 P. 580.

16 P. 587.

17 P. 591.

18 P. 589.

19 P. 585.

20 P. 591.

21 One might even add to it pieces on Beauty, such as the following: New Memoirs of Literature, i (1725), 51; British Magazine, ii (1747), 49; Rambler (1750–52), No. 92; Adventurer (1753–54), No. 82; Critical Rev., iii (1757), 366; European Magazine, vi (1784), 187; Universal Mag., lxxix (1786), 4 and lxxxiv (1789), 322, 364; Hibernian Mag., 1790, Pt. 2, p. 104 and 1799, Pt. 1, p. 255; Lady's Magazine, xxii (1791), 205; Monthly Rev., xxv (1798), 584 (rev. of Kant on the Beautiful)—not in index; Universal Mag., ciii (1798), 197 and cv (1799), 10; Monthly Mirror, vii (1799), 148. And see indexes to the Gentleman's Mag. (1731–87 and 1787–1818) and the Monthly Rev. (vol. ii). There is also a second series of the Monthly, beginning in 1790.