Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T21:17:28.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Go”: Milton's Antinomianism and the Separation Scene in Paradise Lost, Book 9

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Joan S. Bennett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The quarrel between Adam and Eve in book 9 concerns not only relations between the sexes but also the nature of human government. Prelapsarian Adam and Eve, who, like the antinomian Christian, possess total spiritual liberty, deal with an epistemological dilemma that confronted antinomians like Milton during the English revolution: In the absence of intrinsically authoritative external laws, how can one know when one's decision to act is based on the direction of God's spirit dwelling in one's heart and when it is based on personal desire? In the light of Milton's historical answer to this question, we can see that Milton dramatizes in Eve the voluntarist antinomian's tendency to overconfidence and in Adam the humanist antinomian's struggle with right reason. While neither person sins in this scene, both lose their balance in particularly antinomian ways that grant us insight into the necessarily precarious nature of human freedom.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , May 1983 , pp. 388 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Aristotle. The Basic Works of Aristotle. Ed. McKeon, Richard. Trans. Ross, W. D. New York: Random, 1941.Google Scholar
Bell, Millicent. “The Fallacy of the Fall in Paradise Lost.” PMLA 68 (1953):863–83.Google Scholar
Bell, Millicent. Replies to Wayne Shumaker. PMLA 70 (1955):1187–97, 1203.Google Scholar
Bennett, Joan S. “Liberty under the Law: The Chorus and the Meaning of Samson Agonistes.” Milton Studies 12 (1978): 141–63.Google Scholar
Bennett, Joan S. “ ‘A Person Rais'd’: Public and Private Cause in Samson Agonistes.” Studies in English Literature 18 (1978):155–68.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Thomas H. “‘Uncloister'd Virtue’: Adam and Eve in Milton's Paradise.” Milton Studies 3 (1971):119–37.Google Scholar
Bowers, Fredson. “Adam, Eve, and the Fall in Paradise Lost.” PMLA 84 (1969):264–73.Google Scholar
Cain, William. “Learning How to Read: A Note on Paradise Regained, IV.321–30.” Milton Quarterly 13 (1979):120–21.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Trans. John Allen. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Presbyterian Board of Publication, [1938?].Google Scholar
Cohn, Norman. The Pursuit of the Millennium. Fairlawn, N.J.: Essential Books, 1957.Google Scholar
Danielson, Dennis. “Milton's Arminianism and Paradise Lost.” Milton Studies 12 (1978): 47–73.Google Scholar
Dell, William. Christ's Spirit, a Christian's Strength. London, 1651.Google Scholar
Dell, William. The City-Ministers Unmasked. London, 1649.Google Scholar
Dell, William. Right Reformation. London, 1646.Google Scholar
Duhamel, P. Albert. “Milton's Alleged Ramism.” PMLA 67 (1952): 1035–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Empson, William. Milton's God. Rev. ed. London: Chatto and Windus, 1965.Google Scholar
Evans, J. M. Paradise Lost and the Genesis Tradition. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Goodwin, John. Catahaptism. London, 1655.Google Scholar
Goodwin, John. A Quaere, concerning the Church-Covenant, Practiced in the Separate Congregations. London, 1643.Google Scholar
Goodwin, John. Triumviri. London, 1658.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Gary D. “Milton's Defensive God: A Reappraisal.” Studies in Philology 69 (1972): 87–100.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. Milton and the English Revolution. New York: Viking, 1977.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution. New York: Viking, 1972.Google Scholar
Hooker, Richard. Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity. Gen. ed. W. Speed Hill. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1977. Vol. 1, ed. Georges Edelen.Google Scholar
Huehns, Gertrude. Antinomianism in English History with Special Reference to the Period 1640–1660. London: Cresset, 1951.Google Scholar
Jackson, Thomas. The Life of John Goodwin. London: Longman, 1822.Google Scholar
Jacobus, Lee A. Sudden Apprehension: Aspects of Knowledge in Paradise Lost. The Hague: Mouton, 1976.Google Scholar
Kelley, Maurice. This Great Argument. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Kerrigan, William. The Prophetic Milton. Charlottesville: Univ. of Virginia Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Lamont, William. Godly Rule. London: Macmillan, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara. “Innocence and Experience in Milton's Eden.” In New Essays on Paradise Lost. Ed. Thomas Kranidas. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1971, 86–117.Google Scholar
Low, Anthony. “The Parting in the Garden in Paradise Lost.” Philological Quarterly 47 (1968): 30–35.Google Scholar
McColley, Diane K. “Free Will and Obedience in the Separation Scene of Paradise Lost.” Studies in English Literature 12 (1972): 103–20.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Complete Prose Works. Gen. ed. Don M. Wolfe. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1959–82.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Paradise Lost. Ed. Hughes, Merritt Y. New York: Odyssey Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Milton, John. The Works of John Milton. Vol. 11. Ed. and trans. Allan H. Gilbert. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Morton, A. L. The World of the Ranters: Religious Radicalism in the English Revolution. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1970.Google Scholar
Patrick, J. Max. “A Reconsideration of the Fall of Eve.” Etudes Anglaises 28 (1975): 15–21.Google Scholar
Reichert, John. “‘Against His Better Knowledge’: A Case for Adam.” ELH 48 (1981): 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revard, Stella P. “Eve and the Doctrine of Responsibility in Paradise Lost.” PMLA 88 (1973): 69–78.Google Scholar
Safer, Elaine B. “‘Sufficient to Have Stood’: Eve's Responsibility in Book IX.” Milton Quarterly 6 (1972):10–14.Google Scholar
Saltmarsh, John. Free-Grace; or, the Flowings of Christ's Blood Freely to Sinners. 1645; rpt. London, 1661.Google Scholar
Saltmarsh, John. Groanes for Liberty. London, 1646.Google Scholar
Saltmarsh, John. Smoke from the Temple. London, 1646.Google Scholar
Saltmarsh, John. Wonderfull Predictions … London, 1648.Google Scholar
Shumaker, Wayne. Comments on Millicent Bell's “The Fallacy of the Fall in Paradise Lost.” PMLA 70 (1955):1185–87, 1197–1202.Google Scholar
Slights, Camille. The Casuistical Tradition. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Solt, Leo F. “John Saltmarsh: New Model Army Chaplain.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 2 (1951): 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solt, Leo F. Saints in Arms: Puritanism and Democracy in Cromwell's Army. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Tillyard, E. M. W. Studies in Milton. New York: Macmillan, 1951.Google Scholar
Waldock, A. J. A. Paradise Lost and Its Critics. 1947; rpt. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Walwyn, William. Walwyn's Just Defense … (1649). In The Leveller Tracts, 1647–1653. Ed. Haller, William and Davies, Godfrey. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1944, 350–98.Google Scholar
Willey, Basil. The Seventeenth Century Background: Studies in the Thought of the Age in Relation to Poetry and Religion. 1934; rpt. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, A. S. P., ed. Puritanism and Liberty, Being the Army Debates (1647–9) from the Clarke Manuscripts with Supplementary Documents. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1951.Google Scholar