Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:57:19.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

For Love and Money: Of Potboilers and Precautions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

Intercourse means commerce, they told us in school. And we giggled at the explosive word that went off in more than one direction. But the confusion is more than simply a joke of mistaken referents or of metaphoric allusions to intimate contact and interested exchange. It is a tangle of productive sex and enterprising business revealing an adjacency of practices that add up to modernity. In a metaleptic circle of cause and effect, modern desire for family and for wealth seemed to drive those practices, and they helped form the kind of modern subject who desired them. The circularity illustrates what Nietzsche said about the fiction of empirical moorings (279-80). The moorings invented themselves to produce an illusion of stability. This is what happened at the beginnings of European modernity, as Mary Poovey shows in A History of the Modern Fact: truth grounded in empirical facts turns out to be a metaleptic effect of the seventeenth-century fiction of precise accounting, a rhetorical compensation for numbers that could not add up in the precarious conditions of mercantilism. But a century later, precise and transparent accounts were no longer performances that interpreted irregular data; they required proofs of economic and civic credibility. In a broad stroke, we can say that the foundational fiction that followed from honorable entrepreneurship is the dynamic law of desire for development as the natural drive of our particular and collective lives. Laissez-faire was the slogan.

Type
The Changing Profession
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alberdi, Juan Bautista. “Las bases y puntos de partida para la organización política de la república Argentina.” 1852. Halperín Donghi 84111.Google Scholar
Altamirano, Ignacio M.La literatura nacional.” 1868. La literatura nacional. Ed. and prologue by José Luis Martínez. Escritores Mexicanos 52. México: Porrúa, 1949.9-40.Google Scholar
Benedict, Anderson. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. New York: Viking, 1963.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Alberto, Blest Gana. Martin Rivas: Novela de costumbres político-sociales. Ed. Concha, Jaime. Caracas: Ayacucho, 1977.Google Scholar
Breuilly, John. Nationalism and the State. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. Anti-Oedipus. Trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen Lane. Pref. Michel Foucault. New York: Viking, 1977.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. An Introduction. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage, 1980. Vol. 1 of The History of Sexuality.Google Scholar
Franklin J., Franco Trujillismo: Génesis y rehabilitación. Santo Domingo: Cultural Dominicana, 1971.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. Industrial Transformations in the English Novel. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar
González Stephan, Beatriz. La historiografía literaria del liberalismo hispanoamericano del siglo XIX. Habana: Casa de las Américas, 1987.Google Scholar
Halperín Donghi, Tulio. Proyecto y construcción de una nación: Argentina, 1846-1880. Caracas: Ayacucho, 1980.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Philosophy of Right. Trans. T. M. Knox. London: Oxford UP, 1967.Google Scholar
Jaksic, Iván. Personal conversation. 20 Nov. 1999.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst H.Pro Patria Mori in Medieval Political Thought.” Selected Studies. Locust Valley: Augustin, 1965. 308–24.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard A. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. 2nd ed. Berkeley: U of California P, 1991.Google Scholar
Levy, Anita. “Blood, Kinship, and Gender.” Genders 5 (1989): 7085.Google Scholar
Mailloux, Steven. Rhetorical Power. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1989.10.7591/9781501728426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martí, José. Obras completas. Vol. 23. Habana: Ciencias Sociales, 1975.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988.Google Scholar
Morrison, Toni. “Unspeakable Things Unspoken: The Afro-American Presence in American Literature.” Michigan Quarterly Review 28 (1989): 134.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. The Will to Power. Trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Random, 1967.Google Scholar
Oyuela, Calixto. Programa de literatura española y de los estados hispano-americanos. Buenos Aires: Biedma, 1884.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. A History of the Modern Fact. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1998.10.7208/chicago/9780226675183.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Programas detallados para las escuelas secundarias. México: Secretaría de Educación Pública, 1933.Google Scholar
Reyes, Alfonso. “Pasado inmediato.” 1939. Obras completas. Vol. 12. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1960.Google Scholar
Rizal, José. Noli me tangere. Caracas: Ayacucho, 1976.Google Scholar
Ricardo, Rojas. La restauración nacionalista. 1909. Buenos Aires: Librería de la Facultad, 1922.Google Scholar
Róman-Lagunas, Jorge. “Bibliografía anotada de y sobre Alberto Blest Gana.” Revista iberoamericana 112-13 (1980): 605–47.10.5195/REVIBEROAMER.1980.3500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sater, William F. The Heroic Image in Chile: Arturo Prat, Secular Saint. Berkeley: U of California P, 1973.Google Scholar
Sommer, Doris. “Allegory and Dialectics: A Match Made in Romance.” Boundary 2 18.1 (1991): 6082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, Doris. Foundational Fictions: The National Romances of Latin America. Berkeley: U of California P, 1991.Google Scholar
Sommer, Doris. Proceed with Caution, When Engaged by Minority Writing in the Americas. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999.Google Scholar