Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T03:38:07.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Esther Summerson Rehabilitated

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2020

Alex Zwerdling*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Esther Summerson is not the sentimental, insipid character she is usually taken to be. Dickens uses her as the unconscious spokesman of the many characters in Bleak House who have never known parental love and makes her tale the most important illustration of one of the novel's major concerns—the breakdown of the parent-child relationship. His attitude is essentially clinical: he is interested in recording a complex pattern of psychological development in detail. Esther's story demonstrates both the immediate and the long-range effects of her godmother's pious cruelty and neglect. The novel shows that her inhibited intelligence and self-effacement are products of this upbringing and traces her attempt to become a more assured and self-possessed woman. Esther's dawning confidence, however, is shaken first by her illness and disfigurement and then by Mr. Jarndyce's proposal. The two incidents are best understood as crucial symbolic events in her attempt to transcend the determining influences of her childhood. Although Dickens finally resorts to fantasy to resolve Esther's conflicts, his detailed study of the stages of her life is that of a psychological realist interested in revealing the connections between childhood experience and adult personality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 “Dickens in Relation to Criticism,” rpt. in The Dickens Critics, ed. George H. Ford and Lauriat Lane (Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell Univ. Press, 1961), p. 65.

2 Rpt. in Dickens: Bleak House: A Casebook, ed. A. E. Dyson (London: Macmillan, 1969), p. 57.

3 Useful studies of Esther Summerson along psychological lines include James H. Broderick and John E. Grant, “The Identity of Esther Summerson,” MP, 55 (1958), 252–58; William Axton, “The Trouble with Esther,” MLQ, 26 (1965), 545–57, and his “Esther's Nicknames: A Study in Relevance,” The Dickensian, 62 (1966), 158–63; and F. R. and Q. D. Leavis, Dickens the Novelist (London: Chatto & Windus, 1970), pp. 155–60.

4 “The Dickens World: A View from Todgers's,” Sewanee Review, 58 (1950), 431.

5 Charles Dickens, Bleak House (London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1966), pp. 15–16, Ch. iii(The Oxford Illustrated Dickens). Subsequent citations are to this edition.

6 Gandhi's Truth: On the Origins of Militant Nonviolence (New York: Norton, 1969),p. 98.

7 It is significant that in the earlier scene she had vowed to be “kind-hearted,” not “true-hearted,” although she does not seem to be aware of the shift.

8 Charles Dickens: The World of His Novels (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1958), p. 223.