Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:33:04.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elusive Theory and Illusive Practice? Editing Signs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Ruth-Ellen Boetcher Joeres
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Journal World
Information
PMLA , Volume 118 , Issue 2 , March 2003 , pp. 318 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Fish, Stanley. “Being Interdisciplinary Is So Very Hard to Do.” Profession 89. New York: MLA, 1989. 15–22.Google Scholar
Joeres, Ruth-Ellen Boetcher. “On Writing Feminist Academic Prose.” Signs 17 (1992): 701–04.Google Scholar
Laslett, Barbara, and Joeres, Ruth-Ellen B. “Looking Backward, Moving Forward: Five Years Later.” Signs 20 (1995): 507–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillen, Liz. “Ground-Breaking Feminist Journal Grapples with Its Own Success.” Chronicle of Higher Education 10 Mar. 1993: A7–12.Google Scholar
Robinson, Lillian S. Contribution to Forum. PMLA 111 (1996): 277–78.Google Scholar