Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:08:30.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dreamer Again in The Book of the Duchess

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Donald C. Baker
Donald C. Baker*
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural and Mechanical College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes, Documents, and Critical Comment
Information
PMLA , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 1955 , pp. 279 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 All Chaucer quotations are from the Robinson text.

2 J. S. P. Tatlock, The Mind and Art of Chaucer (Syracuse, 1951), p. 30. Kemp Malone, Chapters on Chaucer (Baltimore, 1951), p. 38, suggests, in passing, that Chaucer might have nodded.

3 P. V. D. Shelly, The Living Chaucer (Philadelphia, 1940), pp. 48–49; Bertrand H. Bronson, “The Book of the Duchess Re-opened,” PMLA, lxvii (Sept. 1952), 877; James R. Kreuzer, “The Dreamer in the Book of the Duchess,” PMLA, lxvi (June 1951), 543–545.

4 Malone, pp. 38–39.

5 Wolfgang H. Clemen, Der junge Chaucer, Kölner Anglistische Arbeiten, xxxiii (Bochum-Langendreer, 1938), 60.

6 G. L. Kittredge, Chaucer and His Poetry (Cambridge, Mass., 1915), pp. 37–38.

7 Samuel Schoenbaum, “Chaucer's Black Knight,” MLN, lxviii (Feb. 1953), 121–122, maintains that, although it is nearly a certain historical fact that the Knight is John of Gaunt, the Book of the Duchess must not be read as an historical document at the expense of its being read as a poem, and as an elegy. With this I certainly agree.