Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:28:03.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dickinson and Patriarchal Meter: A Theory of Metrical Codes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

A. R. C. Finch
A. R. C. Finch*
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Stanford, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analysis of Emily Dickinson's metrics suggests that her meters—even in individual lines of poetry—can be read as signs for the connotations they have acquired and for the cultural contexts that have empowered them. Iambic pentameter, the dominant meter in Dickinson's poetic lineage and culture, although rare in her work, plays a significant role in some of her most famous poems. Dickinson's iambic pentameters usually occur in a dynamic with her ordinary meter, the hymn stanza, a relation that reflects her ambivalence toward the male-identified poetic authority represented by iambic pentameter. Reading key poems for their semantic-metrical connections—the ways in which the semantic and metrical levels comment on each other—illuminates Dickinson's association of canonical poetic strength with patriarchal structures such as Christianity, with social conventions of fame and power, and with both triumph and failure.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 102 , Issue 2 , March 1987 , pp. 166 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Auden, W. H. Collected Poems. Ed. Mendelson, Edward. New York: Random, 1976.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Grain of the Voice. Trans. Coverdale, Linda. New York: Hill, 1985.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. Trans. Lavers, Annette. New York: Hill, 1972.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. S/Z. Trans. Howard, Richard. New York: Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
Blake, William. Milton. Boulder: Shambala, with Random, 1978.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence. London: Oxford UP, 1973.Google Scholar
Bogan, Louise. “The Pleasures of Formal Poetry.” The Poet's Work. Ed. Gibbons, Reginald. Boston: Houghton, 1979. 203–14.Google Scholar
Bogus, S. Diane. “Not So Disparate: An Investigation of the Influence of Elizabeth Barrett Browning on the Work of Emily Dickinson.” Dickinson Studies 49 (1984): 38–45.Google Scholar
Capps, Jack L. Emily Dickinson's Reading: 1836–1886. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1966.Google Scholar
Cunningham, J. V. The Collected Essays of J. V. Cunningham. Chicago: Swallow, 1976.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Babette. Poetry Handbook. New York: Grosset, 1962.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Emily. The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson. Ed. Johnson, Thomas H. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1955.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Emily. The Letters of Emily Dickinson. Ed. Johnson, Thomas H. and Ward, Theodora. 3 vols. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1958.Google Scholar
Diehl, Joanne Feit. “Dickinson and Bloom: An Antithetical Reading of Romanticism.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 23 (1981): 418–41.Google Scholar
Diehl, Joanne Feit. Dickinson and the Romantic Imagination. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Eberwein, Jane Donahue. Dickinson: Strategies of Limitation. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1985.Google Scholar
Eberwein, Jane Donahue. “Doing Without: Dickinson as Yankee Woman Poet.” Critical Essays on Emily Dickinson. Ed. Ferlazzo, Paul J. Boston: Hall, 1984. 205–22.Google Scholar
Eichenbaum, Boris. “The Theory of the ‘Formal Method.‘” Russian Formalist Essays: Four Essays. Trans. Lemon, Lee T. and Reis, Marion J. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1965. 99–139.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. The Complete Poems and Plays, 1909–1950. New York: Harcourt, 1958.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Griffin, Clark. The Long Shadow. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Keyser, Samuel Jay. “The Iambic Pentameter.” Versification: Major Language Types. Ed. Wimsatt, W. K. New York: New York UP, 1972. 217–37.Google Scholar
Hollander, John. Vision and Resonance. New York: Oxford UP, 1975.Google Scholar
Homans, Margaret. “Oh, Vision of Language: Dickinson's Poems on Love and Death.” Feminist Critics Read Emily Dickinson. Ed. Juhasz, Suzanne. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1983. 114–33.Google Scholar
Johnson, Thomas. Emily Dickinson: An Interpretative Biography. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1955.Google Scholar
Juhasz, Suzanne. Naked and Fiery Forms: Modern American Poetry by American Women: A New Tradition. New York: Harper, 1976.Google Scholar
Juhasz, Suzanne. The Undiscovered Continent: Emily Dickinson and the Space of the Mind. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Kammer, Jeanne. “The Art of Silence and the Forms of Women's Poetry.” Shakespeare's Sisters: Feminist Essays on Women Poets. Ed. Gilbert, Sandra M. and Gubar, Susan. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1979. 153–64.Google Scholar
Keller, Karl. The Only Kangaroo among the Beauty: Emily Dickinson and America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Leyda, Jay. The Years and Hours of Emily Dickinson. 2 vols. New Haven: Yale UP, 1960.Google Scholar
Lindberg-Seyersted, Brita. The Voice of the Poet: Aspects of Style in the Poetry of Emily Dickinson. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1968.Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri. Analysis of the Poetic Text. Ed. and trans. Johnson, D. Barton. Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1976.Google Scholar
Miller, Christanne. “How ‘Low Feet’ Stagger: Disruptions of Language in Dickinson's Poetry.” Feminist Critics Read Emily Dickinson. Ed. Juhasz, Suzanne. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1983. 134–55.Google Scholar
Miller, Ruth. The Poetry of Emily Dickinson. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 1968.Google Scholar
Mossberg, Mossberg Barbara Antonina. Emily Dickinson: When a Writer Is a Daughter. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Pearce, Roy Harvey. The Continuity of American Poetry. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1961.Google Scholar
Pollak, Vivian. “Emily Dickinson's Valentines.” American Quarterly 26 (1974): 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, David T. The Art of Emily Dickinson's Early Poetry. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1966.Google Scholar
Ransom, John Crowe. “Dickinson's Poetic Personality.” Critics on Emily Dickinson. Ed. Rupp, Richard H. Coral Gables: U of Miami P, 1972. 30–33.Google Scholar
Sewall, Richard B. The Life of Emily Dickinson. 2 vols. New York: Farrar, 1974.Google Scholar
Smart, Christopher. The Poetical Works of Christopher Smart. 2 vols. Ed. Williamson, Karina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1980.Google Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. Poetic Closure: A Study of How Poems End. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1968.Google Scholar
St. Armand, Barton Levi. Emily Dickinson and Her Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Walker, Cheryl. The Nightingale's Burden: Women Poets and American Culture before 1900. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Walsh, John Evangelist. The Hidden Life of Emily Dickinson. New York: Simon, 1971.Google Scholar
Watts, Emily Stipes. The Poetry of American Women from 1632 to 1945. Austin: U of Texas P, 1977.Google Scholar
Whicher, George Frisbie. This Was a Poet: A Critical Biography of Emily Dickinson. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1957.Google Scholar
Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Ed. Bradley, Sculley and Blodgett, Harold W. New York: Norton, 1973.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Richard. “Sumptuous Destitution.” Emily Dickinson: 3 Views. Amherst: Amherst Coll. P, 1960. 35–46.Google Scholar
Wolosky, Shira. Emily Dickinson: A Voice of War. New Haven: Yale UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Zaturenska, Marya. Christina Rossetti. New York: Macmillan, 1949.Google Scholar