Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:09:02.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decadence as Scientific Fulfillment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Christine Ferguson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay challenges two established critical assumptions about late Victorian literary decadence: first, that decadence represented a sterile and ultimately failed attempt to defy social and cultural norms and, second, that the movement was antithetical to the scientific culture of the nineteenth century. Decadence is instead shown to be the logical consequence of a scientific spirit that, by the end of the century, increasingly ignored the demands of utilitarianism and fixated on the pursuit of experimental knowledge for its own sake, regardless of the consequences. Thus, the “failures” of the subject that so frequently mark the end of accounts of decadence such as Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray, Collins's Heart and Science, and Machen's The Great God Pan represent the triumph of a historically specific experimental ethos that valued the transcendence of conventional epistemology over the discovery of useful knowledge.

Type
Cluster on Science in the Nineteenth Century
Information
PMLA , Volume 117 , Issue 3 , May 2002 , pp. 465 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Arnold, Matthew. “Literature and Science.” Nineteenth Century Aug. 1882: 216–30.Google Scholar
Babbage, Charles. “Reflections on the Decline of Science in England and on Some of Its Causes.” Weber 86–97.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Aubrey. Under the Hill; or, The Story of Venus and Tannhauser, in Which Is Set Forth an Exact Account of the Manner of State Held by Madame Venus, Goddess and Meretrix, under the Famous Horselberg, and Containing the Adventures of Tannhauser in That Place, His Journeying to Rome, and Return to the Loving Mountain. New York: Grove, 1967.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. Introduction. The Origin of Species. By Charles Darwin. New York: Oxford UP, 1998. vii-xviii.Google Scholar
Bernard, Claude. “Introduction à l'étude de la médecine expérimentale.” Trans. A. S. Weber. Weber 317–35.Google Scholar
Brackett, William. “Modern Science in Its Relation to Literature.” Popular Science Monthly June 1879: 166–77.Google Scholar
Carter, A. E. The Idea of Decadence in French Literature, 1830-1901. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1958.Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power. “The Scientific Spirit of the Age.” Contemporary Review July 1888: 126–39.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. Heart and Science: A Story of the Present Time. Ed. Farmer, Steve. Orchard Park: Broadview, 1996.Google Scholar
Comte, Auguste. “The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte.” Weber 205–13.Google Scholar
Liz, Constable, Denisoff, Dennis, and Polotsky, Matthew. Introduction. Constable, Denisoff, and Polotsky, Perennial Decay 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liz, Constable. Perennial Decay: On the Aesthetics and Politics of Decadence. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1999.Google Scholar
de Bury, Marie Blaye. “The Decadence of Thought in France.” Fortnightly Review 1 Mar. 1889: 395–412.Google Scholar
Gagnier, Regenia. “A Critique of Practical Aesthetics.” Aesthetics and Ideology. Ed. Levine, George. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1994. 264–82.Google Scholar
Gilman, Richard. Decadence: The Strange Life of an Epithet. New York: Farrar, 1979.Google Scholar
Haggard, H. Rider. She. New York: Penguin, 1986.Google Scholar
Huysmans, J. K. Against the Grain. New York: Random, 1956.Google Scholar
Kraft-Ebing, Richard von. Psychopathia Sexualis: A Medico-Forensic Study. Trans. Harry E. Wedeck. New York: Putnam, 1965.Google Scholar
Lombroso, Cesare. L'uomo delinquente; studiato in rapporto alla antropologia, alla medicina legale ed alla discipline carcerarie. Milano: Hoepli, 1876.Google Scholar
Machen, Arthur. The Great God Pan. London: Creation, 1993.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Morell. “Is Medicine a Progressive Science?” Fortnightly Review 1 June 1886: 845–54.Google Scholar
Mason, Stuart. Oscar Wilde: Art and Morality; A Record of the Discussion Which Followed the Publication of Dorian Gray. New York: Haskell, 1971.Google Scholar
Moore, George. Confessions of a Young Man. New York: Modern Lib., 1917.Google Scholar
Nordau, Max. Degeneration. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1993.Google Scholar
The Philistine. The New Fiction (A Protest against Sex-Mania) and Other Papers. London: Westminster Gazette Office, 1895.Google Scholar
Reed, John Robert. Decadent Style. Athens: Ohio UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael. “Decadent Paradoxes.” Trans. Liz Constable and Matthew Polotsky. Constable, Denisoff, and Polotsky, Perennial Decay 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, James. “Concepts of Decadence in Nineteenth-Century France.” Studies in Philology 50 (1953): 640–51.Google Scholar
Stutfield, Hugh E. M. “Tommyrotics.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine June 1895: 833–45.Google Scholar
Symons, Arthur. “The Decadent Movement in Literature.” Harper's New Monthly Magazine Nov. 1893: 858–67.Google Scholar
Symons, Arthur. The Symbolist Movement in Literature. New York: Dutton, 1958.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. K. R. The Decadent Dilemma. London: Arnold, 1983.Google Scholar
Weber, A. S., ed. Nineteenth-Century Science: An Anthology. Peterborough, ON: Broadview, 2000.Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray. New York: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar. “The Soul of a Man under Socialism.” De Profundis and Other Writings. New York: Penguin, 1986. 19–53.Google Scholar
Youmans, E. L. The Culture Demanded by Modern Life. New York: D. Appleton, 1867.Google Scholar
Zola, Emile. “The Experimental Novel.” “The Experimental Novel” and Other Essays. Trans. Belle M. Sherman. New York: Haskell, 1964. 1–54.Google Scholar