Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:15:38.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Composition, English, and the University

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

The role composition plays in the contemporary American university, particularly in relation to the english department, has changed from the days when composition was not an expertise but a duty. Initiated on the college level in the 1870s, as John Brereton has argued, at a time much like our own, when the American college was “in danger of becoming irrelevant to a rapidly changing nation” (3), composition consolidated the many kinds of writing done in the courses (and in the extracurriculum) of universities into a required academic subject, positioned at the threshold of college education. It was charged with preparing students for the rigors of college study and for citizenship and professional life. For many generations of college English teachers, composition was an expected part of the job: everyone, whatever their specialty, taught first-year writing.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bartholomae, David. Writing on the Margins: Essays on Composition and Teaching. Boston: Bedford-St. Martin's, 2005. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomae, David, and Petrosky, Anthony, eds. Ways of Reading: A Reader for Writers. 9th ed. Boston: Bedford-St. Martin's, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Bialostosky, Donald. Impromptu remarks. Executive Committee Meeting, Dept. of English, U of Pittsburgh, Oct. 2013.Google Scholar
Brandt, Deborah. “Sponsors of Literacy”. College Composition and Communication 49.2 (1998): 165–85. Print.Google Scholar
Brereton, John. The Origins of Composition Studies in the American College, 1875-1925. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. A Geopolitics of Academic Writing. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Carr, Jean Ferguson, Carr, Stephen L., and Schultz, Lucille M. Archives of Instruction: Nineteenth-Century Rhetorics, Readers, and Composition Books in the United States. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
DeGenaro, William, ed. Who Says? Working-Class Rhetoric, Class Consciousness, and Community. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Dingo, Rebecca. Networking Arguments: Rhetoric, Transnational Feminism, and Public Policy Writing. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2012. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. Journals and Miscellaneous Notebooks. Vol. 4 (1832-34). Ed. Alfred R. Ferguson. William Gilman et al., gen. eds. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1964. Print. 16 vols. 1960–82.Google Scholar
Godzich, Wlad. The Culture of Literacy. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Grace, Jean. Working Knowledge: Composition and the Teaching of Professional Writing. Diss. U of Pittsburgh, 2008. ProQuest. Web. 1 Feb. 2014.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Henry, and Kelley, Wyn, eds. Reading in a Participatory Culture: Remixing Moby-Dick in the English Classroom. New York: Teacher's Coll. P; Berkeley: Natl. Writing Project, 2013. Print.Google Scholar
Literacy: A Critical Sourcebook. Ed. Cushman, Ellen, Kintgen, Eugene R., Kroll, Barry M., and Rose, Mike. Boston: Bedford-St. Martin's, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter. “Writing Is a Technology That Restructures Thought.” The Written Word: Literacy in Transition. Ed. Baumann, Gerd. New York: Oxford UP, 1986. 2350. Print.Google Scholar
Perspectives on Literacy. Ed. Kintgen, Eugene R., Kroll, Barry M., and Rose, Mike. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Rice, Jenny. Distant Publics: Development Rhetoric and the Subject of Crisis. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2012. Print.Google Scholar
Rickert, Thomas. Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2013. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipka, Jody. Toward a Composition Made Whole. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Sommers, Nancy. “Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers”. College Composition and Communication 31.4 (1980): 378–88. Print.Google Scholar