No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Classroom in the Canon: T.S. Eliot's Modern English Literature Extension Course for Working People and The Sacred Wood
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2020
Abstract
Literary critics have long imagined that T. S. Eliot's The Sacred Wood (1920) shaped the canon and methods of countless twentieth-century classrooms. This essay turns instead to the classroom that made The Sacred Wood: the Modern English Literature extension school tutorial that Eliot taught to working-class adults between 1916 and 1919. Contextualizing Eliot's tutorial within the extension school movement shows how the ethos and practices of the Workers' Educational Association shaped his teaching. Over the course of three years, Eliot and his students reimagined canonical literature as writing by working poets for working people—a model of literary history that fully informed his canon reformation in The Sacred Wood. This example demonstrates how attention to teaching changes the history of English literary study. It further reveals how all kinds of institutions, not just elite universities, have shaped the discipline's methods and canons.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2018
References
Works Cited
Atkinson, Mabel. “Syllabus of a Course of Tutorial Classes on the Social History of England.” U of London P, 1911. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Baldick, Chris. The Social Mission of English Criticism, 1848–1932. Clarendon Press / Oxford UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Bloor, R.H.U. “Syllabus of a Course of Lectures on Ideals and Issues of the Present Struggle.” U of London P, 1917. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Brierley, S.S. “Syllabus for a Tutorial Class in Psychology.” U of London P, 1917. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Brooker, Jewel Spears. Mastery and Escape: T.S. Eliot and the Dialectic of Modernism. U of Massachusetts P, 1994.Google Scholar
Burrows, John H. University Adult Education in London: A Century of Achievement. U of London / National Institute of Adult Education, 1976.Google Scholar
Bush, Ron. “‘Intensity by Association’: T.S. Eliot's Passionate Allusions.” Modernism/Modernity, vol. 20, no. 4, Nov. 2013, pp. 709–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collini, Stefan. “From ‘Non-fiction Prose’ to ‘Cultural Criticism’: Genre and Disciplinarity in Victorian Studies.” Rethinking Victorian Culture, edited by John, Juliet and Jenkins, Alice, Macmillan Press / St. Martin's Press, 1999, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
Davies, Alice. “Syllabus of a Course of Tutorial Classes Some Writers of the Nineteenth Century and After.” U of London P, 1913. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. “The Rise of English.” Literary Theory: An Introduction, 2nd ed., U of Minnesota P, 1996.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. “The Function of Criticism.” Selected Essays, 1917–1932, Faber and Faber, 1932, pp. 12–24.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. The Letters of T.S. Eliot, 1898–1922. edited by Eliot, Valerie and Haughton, Hugh, rev. ed., Yale UP, 2011. Vol. 1 of The Letters of T.S. Eliot.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. “Syllabus for a Course of Tutorial Classes on Modern English Literature.” U of London P, 1916. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. “Syllabus for a Course of Tutorial Classes on Modern English Literature (Second Year's Work).” U of London P, 1917. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. “Syllabus for a Course of Tutorial Classes on Modern English Literature (Third Year's Work).” U of London P, 1918. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5.Google Scholar
Epstein, M. “Syllabus for a Course of Tutorial Classes on Descriptive Economics (Modern Society in Its Economic Aspect).” U of London P, 1912. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Epstein, M. “Syllabus for a Course of Tutorial Classes on Descriptive Economics (Modern Society in Its Economic Aspect).” U of London P, 1915. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Epstein, M. “Syllabus for a Course of Twenty Lectures (Modern Society in Its Economic Aspect).” U of London P, 1914. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Farley, R.P. “Syllabus of a Course of Tutorial Classes on Poverty: Suggested Causes and Remedies (First Year's Work in Sociology).” U of London P, 1917–18. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Freeman, Arnold. “Syllabus of a Tutorial Class on the Economic Problems of Demobilisation.” U of London P, 1916. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan. No Man's Land: The Place of the Woman Writer in the Twentieth Century. vol. 1, Yale UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Goldman, Lawrence. Dons and Workers: Oxford and Adult Education since 1850. Clarendon Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Lawrence. “The First Students in the Workers' Educational Association: Individual Enlightenment and Collective Advance.” A Ministry of Enthusiasm: Centenary Essays on the Workers' Educational Association, edited by Roberts, Stephen K., Pluto Press, 2003, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Goldring, Douglas. “Modern Critical Prose.” Chapbook, vol. 2, no. 8, Feb. 1920, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
Gorak, Jan. “From Prodigality to Economy: T.S. Eliot on the ‘Minor Elizabethans.‘” The Modern Language Review, vol. 108, no. 4, 2013, pp. 1064–85.Google Scholar
Great Britain, Parliament, House of Commons. Session Papers. vol. 40, H.M. Stationery Office, 1913.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. U of Chicago P, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillory, John. “The Ideology of Canon-Formation: T.S. Eliot and Cleanth Brooks.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 10, no. 1, Sept. 1983, pp. 173–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, B.L.K. “Syllabus for a Tutorial Class in Aspects of Victorian Literature (First Year).” U of London P. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Jack, A.A. “Lecturer's Report for the Life of the Nineteenth Century as Represented in Literature.” University of London Joint Committee for the Promotion of the Higher Education of Working People Lecturers' and Examiners' Reports, session 1914–15, Summer 1914. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 2/23/74.Google Scholar
Lamos, Colleen. Deviant Modernism: Sexual and Textual Errancy in T.S. Eliot, James Joyce, and Marcel Proust. Cambridge UP, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrie, Alexandra. The Beginnings of University English: Extramural Study, 1885–1910. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Albert. University Tutorial Classes: A Study in the Development of Higher Education among Working Men and Women. Longmans, Green, and Co., 1913.Google Scholar
McDonald, Gail. Learning to Be Modern: Pound, Eliot, and the American University. Oxford UP, 1993.Google Scholar
McDowell, Nicholas. “Early Modern Stereotypes and the Rise of English: Jonson, Dryden, Arnold, Eliot.” Critical Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3, Autumn 2006, pp. 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Mabel. “Syllabus for Problems of Social Economics Arising from the War.” U of London P, 1916. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5b.Google Scholar
Pringle, E.H. “Syllabus for Modern Economic Problems.” U of London P, 1911. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/2.Google Scholar
Renker, Elizabeth. The Origins of American Literature Study: An Institutional History. Cambridge UP, 2010.Google Scholar
Robson, Catherine. Heart Beats: Everyday Life and the Memorized Poem. Princeton UP, 2012.Google Scholar
Schuchard, Ronald. Eliot's Dark Angel: Intersections of Life and Art. Oxford UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Schuchard, Ronald. “T.S. Eliot as Extension Lecturer, 1916–1919.” The Review of English Studies, vol. 25, no. 98, May 1974, pp. 163–73 / vol. 25, no. 99, Aug. 1974, pp. 292–304.Google Scholar
Shairp, Mordaunt. “Syllabus of a Course of Ten Lectures on the Literary Inspiration of the Great War.” U of London P, 1919. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Slater, Gilbert. “Syllabus of a Course of Tutorial Classes on the Worker and the State.” U of London P, 1911. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/1.Google Scholar
Spurgeon, Caroline. “Lecturer's Report for Seminar on the Age of Johnson.” Joint Committee for the Promotion of the Higher Education of Working People Lecturers' and Examiners' Reports, session 1915–16. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 2/23/79.Google Scholar
Styler, W.E. “T.S. Eliot as Adult Tutor.” Notes and Queries, vol. 19, no. 2, Feb. 1972, pp. 53–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, J. Lionel. “Syllabus for Course of Tutorial Classes on the Condition of the People,” U of London P, 1911. Senate House Library, U of London EM 6/6/1.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. Lionel. “Syllabus of a Preparatory Tutorial Class in Life in the Home (Some Human Domestic Life Problems).” U of London P, 1917. Senate House Library, U of London, EM 6/6/5C.Google Scholar
Tillyard, E.M.W. The Muse Unchained: An Intimate Account of the Revolution in English Studies at Cambridge. Bowes and Bowes, 1958.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, Gauri. Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India. Columbia UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Wellmon, Chad. Organizing Enlightenment: Information Overload and the Invention of the Modern Research University. Johns Hopkins UP, 2015.Google Scholar