Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:48:51.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Chinese Renaissance: A Transcultural Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Gang Zhou
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the ways in which the idea of renaissance was understood and appropriated by Chinese intellectuals in the early twentieth century. My discussion foregrounds Hu Shi, one of the most important intellectual leaders in modern China and the main architect of the Chinese vernacular movement. I analyze his rewriting and reinvention of the European Renaissance as well as his declaration and presentation of the Chinese Renaissance in various contexts. Hu's creative uses of the Italian Renaissance and passionate claims for a Chinese Renaissance reveal the performative magic of the word renaissance and prompt us to ask what a renaissance is. The Chinese Renaissance and the fact that various non-European countries have declared and promoted their own renaissances invite a scholarly reconsideration of “renaissance” as a trans-cultural phenomenon rather than as a critical category originated and therefore owned by a certain culture.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 120 , Issue 3 , May 2005 , pp. 783 - 795
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Burckhardt, Jacob. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy. Trans. Middlemore, S. G. C. London: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. “Jacob Burckhardt and the Italian Renaissance.” Burckhardt 1–15.Google Scholar
Chen, Xiaomei. Occidentalism: A Theory of Counter-discourse in Post-Mao China. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Chen Duxiu. “Wenxue geming lun” [On Literary Revolution]. Zhao, Zhongguo 1:44–47.Google Scholar
Chen Pingyuan. Zhongguo xiandai xueshu de jianli [The Establishment of Modern Chinese Scholarship]. Beijing: Beijing UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Chow, Tse-Tsung. The May Fourth Movement. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1964.Google Scholar
Damrosch, David. What Is World Literature? Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnton, Robert. The Forbidden Best-Sellers of Pre-revolutionary France. New York: Norton, 1995.Google Scholar
Denton, Kirk, trans. “Some Modest Proposals for the Reform of Literature.” By Shi, Hu. Modern Chinese Literary Thought: Writings on Literature, 1893.-1945. Ed. Denton, . Stanford: Stanford UP, 1996. 123–40.Google Scholar
Dolezelova-Velingerova, Milena. “The Origins of Modern Chinese Literature.” Modern Chinese Literature in the May Fourth Era. Ed. Goldman, Merle. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1977. 17–35.Google Scholar
Eber, Irene. “Thoughts on Renaissance in Modern China: Problems of Definition.” Studia Asiatica: Essays in Asian Studies in Felicitation of the Seventy-Fifth Anniversary of Professor Chen Shou-yi. Ed. Laurence, G. Thompson. San Francisco: Chinese Materials Center, 1975. 189–220.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles. “Diglossia.” Word 15 (1959): 325–40.10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Wallace. The Renaissance in Historical Thought: Five Centuries of Interpretation. Cambridge: Houghton, 1948.Google Scholar
Gunn, Edward. Rewriting Chinese: Style and Innovation in Twentieth-Century Chinese Prose. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Haydon, A. Eustace. Foreword. Hu, Chinese Renaissance, n. pag.Google Scholar
Hsia, C. T. A History of Modern Chinese Fiction, 1917.-1957. New Haven: Yale UP, 1961.Google Scholar
Hu Shi. The Chinese Renaissance. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1933.Google Scholar
Hu Shi. Hu Shi liuxue riji [Hu Shi's Diary While Studying Abroad]. Taipei: Commercial, 1959. 4 vols.Google Scholar
Hu Shi. “Jianshe de wenxue geming lun” [Toward a Constructive Theory of Literary Revolution]. Zhao, Zhongguo 1:127–40.Google Scholar
Hu Shi. “Wenxue gailiang chuyi” [Some Modest Suggestions for Literary Reform]. Zhao, Zhongguo 1:34–43.Google Scholar
Kopf, David. British Orientalism and the Bengal Renaissance: The Dynamics of Indian Modernization, 1773.-1885. Berkeley: U of California P, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qichao, Liang. “On the Recent Scholarship.” Xinmin congbao [New Citizen Journal] 53–58 (1904). Zhongguo xueshu sixiang bianqian zhi dashi [On the Development of Chinese Scholarship and Intellectual Trends]. Taipei: Huazheng shuju, 1981.Google Scholar
Liu, Lydia. Translingual Practice: Literature, National Culture, and Translated Modernity in China, 1900.-37. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno. The Italian Language. Boston: Faber, 1984.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry. Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Fernando. Cuban Counterpoint: Tobacco and Sugar. Durham: Duke UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge, 1992.10.4324/9780203163672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Knopf, 1993.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. “Traveling Theory.” The Edward Said Reader. Ed. Bayoumi, Moustafa and Rubin, Andrew. New York: Vintage, 2000. 195–218.Google Scholar
Sichel, Edith. The Renaissance. New York: Henry Holt, 1914.Google Scholar
Volosinov, V. N. “Verbal Interaction.” Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology. Ed. Innis, Robert. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1985. 47–66.Google Scholar
Yeh, Michelle. Modern Chinese Poetry: Theory and Practice since 1917. New Haven: Yale UP, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao Jiabi. Preface. Zhao, Zhongguo 1:1–2.Google Scholar
Zhao Jiabi. Preface. Zhao, ed. Zhongguo xinwenxue daxi [Compendium of Modern Chinese Literature]. Shanghai: Liangyou tushu gongsi, 1935. 10 vols.Google Scholar