Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:03:55.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chaucer and the Silence of History: Situating the Canon's Yeoman's Tale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Britton J. Harwood
Britton J. Harwood*
Affiliation:
Miami University, Oxford, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dissonances within texts may result from contradictions within ideology or the contradiction between ideology and history. The disjunctions between the two parts of the Canon's Yeoman's Tale, between both parts and the ending, and the gaps within each of the parts can be explained as arising with the contradiction between Chaucer's ideological project in the tale—an attack on the emergence of productive capital—and the literary means for the attack. The result is a confession told without moral content and then a fabliau made to serve Christian morality. Productive capital, which is virtually unrepresented elsewhere in the Chaucerian canon, is both invisible and glaring in the tale; and it competed in Chaucer's London with commercial capital, which reinforced the feudal aristocracy as well as depended on it.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 102 , Issue 3 , May 1987 , pp. 338 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Aers, David. Chaucer, Langland, and the Creative Imagination. London: Routledge, 1980.Google Scholar
Aiken, Pauline. “Vincent of Beauvais and Chaucer's Knowledge of Alchemy.” Studies in Philosophy 41 (1944): 371–89.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry. Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London: NLB, 1974.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. G. “The Yeoman's Canons: A Conjecture.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 61 (1962): 232–43.Google Scholar
Balibar, E., and Macherey, P. “Sur la littérature comme forme idéologique: Quelques hypothèses marxistes.” Littérature 13 (1974): 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “Introduction à l'analyse structurale des récits.” Communications 8 (1966): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Paull F. “The Canon's Yeoman's Tale.” Modern Language Notes 40 (1925): 152–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Paull F. Chaucer's Verse. Durham: Duke UP, 1961.Google Scholar
Bird, Ruth. The Turbulent London of Richard II. London: Longmans, 1949.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. “On Editing the Canterbury Tales.” Medieval Studies for J. A. W. Bennett. Ed. Heyworth, P. L. Oxford: Clarendon, 1981. 103–19.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc. Feudal Society. 1940. Trans. L. A. Manyon. 2 vols. London: Routledge, 1961.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. “Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe.” Past and Present 70 (1976): 30–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. “Is the ‘Canon's Yeoman's Tale’ Apocryphal?” English Studies 64 (1983): 481–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burlin, Robert B. Chaucerian Fiction. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahn, K. S. “Chaucer's Merchants and the Foreign Exchange: An Introduction to Medieval Finance.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 2 (1980): 81–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Riverside Chaucer. Ed. Benson, L. D. et al. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton, 1987.Google Scholar
Chaucer Life-Records. Ed. Crow, Martin M. and Olson, Clair C. Oxford: Clarendon, 1966.Google Scholar
Critchley, J. S. Feudalism. London: Allen, 1978.Google Scholar
Damon, S. F. “Chaucer and Alchemy.” PMLA 39 (1924): 782–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. La divina commedia. Ed. Grandgent, C. H. Rev. Charles S. Singleton. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1972.Google Scholar
Dean, James. “Dismantling the Canterbury Book.” PMLA 100 (1985): 746–62.Google Scholar
Dobb, Maurice. “A Reply.” The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism. Ed. Hilton, Rodney. London: NLB, 1976. 57–67.Google Scholar
Dobb, Maurice. Studies in the Development of Capitalism. New York: International, 1947.Google Scholar
Dobson, R. B., comp. The Peasants' Revolt of 1381. London: Macmillan, 1970.Google Scholar
Duncan, E. H. “The Literature of Alchemy and Chaucer's Canon's Yeoman's Tale: Framework, Theme, and Characters.” Speculum 43 (1968): 633–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, D. “The Code of Chaucer's ‘Secree of Secrees’: Arabic Alchemical Terminology in The Canon's Yeoman's Tale.” Archiv 207 (1970): 260–76.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. “The Canon's Yeoman's Prologue and Tale. An Interpretation.” Philological Quarterly 46 (1967): 1–17.Google Scholar
Gerould, G. H. “The Social Status of Chaucer's Franklin.” PMLA 41 (1926): 262–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, John. The English Works. Ed. Macaulay, G. C. 2 vols. London: Oxford UP, 1900.Google Scholar
Gratian, . Decretum Magistri Gratiani. Ed. Friedberg, Aemilius. 2 vols. Leipzig, 1879.Google Scholar
Grenberg, B. L. “The Canon's Yeoman's Tale. Boethian Wisdom and the Alchemists.” Chaucer Review 1 (1966): 37–54.Google Scholar
Grennen, J. E. “The Canon's Yeoman and the Cosmic Furnace: Language and Meaning in the ‘Canon's Yeoman's Tale.‘” Criticism 4 (1962): 225–40.Google Scholar
Grennen, J. E. “The Canon's Yeoman's Alchemical ‘Mass.‘” Studies in Philology 62 (1965): 546–60.Google Scholar
Grennen, J. E. “Saint Cecilia's ‘Chemical Wedding’: The Unity of the Canterbury Tales, Fragment VIII.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 65 (1966): 466–81.Google Scholar
Gross, Charles. The Gild Merchant. Oxford, 1890.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Knowledge and Human Interests. 1968. Trans. Jeremy Shapiro. Boston: Beacon, 1971.Google Scholar
Harrington, D. V. “The Narrator of the Canon's Yeoman's Tale.” Annuale mediaevale 9 (1968): 85–97.Google Scholar
Hartung, Albert E. ‘“Pars Secunda’ and the Development of the Canon's Yeoman's Tale.” Chaucer Review 12 (1977): 111–28.Google Scholar
Herbert, William. History of the Twelve Great Livery Companies of London. 2 vols. London, 1836–37.Google Scholar
Herz, J. S. “The Canon's Yeoman's Prologue and Tale.” Modern Philology 58 (1961): 231–37.Google Scholar
Hilton, Rodney. Bond Men Made Free: Medieval Peasant Movements and the English Rising of 1381. London: Temple Smith, 1973.Google Scholar
Hilton, Rodney. “Peasant Movements in England before 1381.” Economic History Review 2nd ser. 2 (1949): 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, Rodney, ed. The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism. London: NLB, 1976.Google Scholar
Hindess, Barry, and Hirst, Paul Q. Pre-Capitalist Modes of Production. London: Routledge, 1975.Google Scholar
Hoy, Michael, and Stevens, Michael. Chaucer's Major Tales. London: Norton Bailey, 1969.Google Scholar
Knight, Stephen. “Politics and Chaucer's Poetry.” The Radical Reader. Ed. Knight, Stephen and Wilding, Michael. Sydney: Wild, 1977. 169–92.Google Scholar
Kosminsky, E. A. “The Evolution of Feudal Rent in England from the XIth to the XVth Centuries.” Past and Present 7 (1955): 12–35.Google Scholar
Kosminsky, E. A. “Service and Money Rents in the Thirteenth Century.” Economic History Review 5.2 (1935): 24–45.Google Scholar
Kosminsky, E. A. Studies in the Agrarian History of England in the Thirteenth Century. 1947. Ed. Hilton, R. H. Trans. Kisch, Ruth. Oxford: Blackwell, 1956.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Trans. Moore, Winston and Cammack, Paul. London: Verso, 1985.Google Scholar
Langland, William. Piers Plowman: The B Version. Ed. Kane, George and Donaldson, E. T. London: Athlone, 1975.Google Scholar
Lawler, Traugott. The One and the Many in the Canterbury Tales. Hamden: Archon, 1980.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. “The Structural Study of Myth.” 1957. Structural Anthropology. Trans. Jacobson, Claire and Schoepf, B. G. Garden City: Anchor-Doubleday, 1967. 202–28.Google Scholar
Liber albus. Ed. Riley, Henry T. London, 1861.Google Scholar
Lowes, J. L. “The Dragon and His Brother.” Modern Language Notes 28 (1913): 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumiansky, R. M. Of Sondry Folk: The Dramatic Principle in the Canterbury Tales. Austin: U of Texas P, 1955.Google Scholar
Macherey, Pierre. A Theory of Literary Production. 1966. Trans. Geoffrey Wall. London: Routledge, 1978.Google Scholar
Manly, John M., and Rickert, Edith, eds. The Text of the Canterbury Tales. 8 vols. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1940.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital. Vol. 1. 1867. Trans. Eden Paul and Cedar Paul. London: Dent, 1930.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 3. 1894. Ed. Engels, Frederick. Trans. Untermann, Ernest. Chicago: Kerr, 1909. 3 vols. 1906–09.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Frederick. The German Ideology. 1846. Ed. Arthur, C. J. New York: International, 1978.Google Scholar
McColly, W. B. “Chaucer's Yeoman and the Rank of His Knight.” Chaucer Review 20 (1985): 14–27.Google Scholar
McCracken, Samuel. “Confessional Prologue and the Topography of the Canon's Yeoman.” Modern Philology 68 (1971): 289–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKisack, May. The Fourteenth Century, 1307–1399. Oxford History of England 5. Oxford: Clarendon, 1959.Google Scholar
Muscatine, Charles. Chaucer and the French Tradition. Berkeley: U of California P, 1957.Google Scholar
Muscatine, Charles. Poetry and Crisis in the Age of Chaucer. Notre Dame: U of Notre Dame P, 1972.Google Scholar
Olson, G. “Chaucer, Dante, and the Structure of Fragment VIII (G) of the Canterbury Tales.” Chaucer Review 16 (1982): 222–36.Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek. The Canterbury Tales. London: Allen, 1985.Google Scholar
Peck, R. A. “The Ideas of ‘Entente’ and Translation in Chaucer's Second Nun's Tale.” Annuale mediaevale 8 (1967): 17–37.Google Scholar
Postan, M. M. “The Economic Foundations of Medieval Society.” 1951. Essays on Medieval Agriculture and General Problems of the Medieval Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1973. 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postan, M. M. “The Fifteenth Century.” 1939. Essays on Medieval Agriculture and General Problems of the Medieval Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1973. 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Eileen. The Wool Trade in English Medieval History. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1941.Google Scholar
Reidy, John. “Chaucer's Canon and the Unity of The Canon's Yeoman's Tale.” PMLA 80 (1965): 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickert, Edith. “Extracts from a Fourteenth-Century Account Book.” Modern Philology 24 (1926): 111–19, 249–56.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W. Jr. ‘“And for My Land Thus Hastow Mordred Me?‘: Land Tenure, the Cloth Industry, and the Wife of Bath.” Chaucer Review 14 (1980): 403–20.Google Scholar
Root, Robert K. The Poetry of Chaucer: A Guide to Its Study and Appreciation. Rev. ed. Boston: Houghton, 1934.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, B. A. “The Contrary Tales of the Second Nun and the Canon's Yeoman.” Chaucer Review 2 (1968): 278–91.Google Scholar
Ruggiers, Paul G. The Art of the Canterbury Tales. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1965.Google Scholar
Ruska, Julius. “Chaucer und das Buch Senior.” Anglia 61 (1937): 136–37.Google Scholar
Salzmann, L. F. English Industries of the Middle Ages. Boston: Houghton, 1913.Google Scholar
Searle, Eleanor. Lordship and Community: Battle Abbey and Its Banlieu. Toronto: Pontifical Inst., 1974.Google Scholar
Spargo, J. W. “The Canon's Yeoman's Prologue and Tale.” Sources and A nalogues of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales. Ed. Bryan, W. F. and Dempster, Germaine. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1941. 685–98.Google Scholar
Strohm, Paul. “Form and Social Statement in Confessio amantis and The Canterbury Tales.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 1 (1974): 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Kohachiro. “A Contribution to the Discussion.” 1952. The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism. Ed. Hilton, Rodney. London: NLB, 1976. 68–97.Google Scholar
Tatlock, John S. P., and Kennedy, Arthur G., comps. A Concordance to the Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer and to the Romaunt of the Rose. Washington: Carnegie Inst., 1927.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. B. “The Canon's Yeoman's Breath: Emanations of a Metaphor.” English Studies 60 (1979): 380–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. A History of Magic and Experimental Science. Vol. 3. New York: Columbia UP, 1934. 8 vols. 1923–58.Google Scholar
Thrupp, Sylvia L. The Merchant Class of Medieval London. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1948.Google Scholar
Unwin, George. The Gilds and Companies of London. Ed. Fisher, F. J. 4th ed. London: Case, 1963.Google Scholar
Whittock, Trevor. A Reading of the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1968.Google Scholar