Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:59:39.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bernini and Roman Commedie Ridicolose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Jackson I. Cope
Jackson I. Cope*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gianlorenzo Bernini's single surviving playscript offers a satire on Bernini's own fame as a creator of scenic stage marvels as well as a satiric analysis of his younger painter-playwright rival from Naples, Salvator Rosa. But Bernini's play also raises general issues about the relations of amateurs and professionals in the leveling context of carnival, about the effect of printing on a subgenre of the improvisational scenarii of the commedia dell' arte as printed texts established a popular reading audience in seventeenth-century Rome, and about the concept of “popular” in the relations of class and genre implicit not only in Bernini's satire but in much of the seventeenth-century generic mixing that took place far outside the exemplary conditions of the Roman commedie ridicolose.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 102 , Issue 2 , March 1987 , pp. 177 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Angelini, Franca. “L'illusione comica di Gian Lorenzo Bernini.” Le théâtre italien et Europe (XVIIe–XVIIIe siècles). Actes du 2e Congrès International. Ed. Christian, Bec and Mamczarz, Irene. Citta di Castello: Olschki, 1985. 169–78.Google Scholar
Audisio, Felicita. “Lettere e testi teatrali di Bernini.” Barocco romano e barocco italiano. Ed. Fagiolo, Marcello and Madonna, Maria Luisa. Roma: Gangemi, 1985. 26–44.Google Scholar
Baldinucci, Filippo. Vita di Gian Lorenzo Bernini. Ed. Ludovici, Sergio Samek. Milano: Milione, 1948.Google Scholar
Beecher, D. A. “Gianlorenzo Bernini's The Impresario: The Artist as the Supreme Trickster.” University of Toronto Quarterly 53 (1984): 235–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernini, Gian Lorenzo. Fontana di Trevi: Commedia inedita. Ed. D'Onofrio, Cesare. Roma: Staderini, 1963.Google Scholar
Bragaglia, Anton Giulio. Pulcinella. Roma: Casini, 1953.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe. New York: Harper, 1978.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. “Intellectual History or Sociocultural History? The French Trajectories.” Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New Perspectives. Ed. LaCapra, Dominick and Kaplan, Stephen L. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1982. 13–46.Google Scholar
Cope, Jackson I. Dramaturgy of the Daemonic: Studies in Antigeneric Theater from Ruzante to Grimaldi. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Cope, Jackson I. The Theater and the Dream: From Metaphor to Form in Renaissance Drama. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1973.Google Scholar
Evelyn, John. Diary. Ed. DeBeer, E. S. 6 vols. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1955.Google Scholar
Fagiolo dell' Arco, Maurizio, and Marcello Fagiolo dell', Arco. Bernini, una introduzione al gran teatro barocco. Roma, 1967.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien, and Martin, Henri-Jean. The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing 1450–1800. 1958. Trans. David Gerard. London: Verso, 1976.Google Scholar
Fratellini, Bianca Maria. “Appunti per un'analisi della commedia La fiera di M. Buonarroti il Giovane in rapporto alla cultura di G. L. Bernini.” Barocco romano e barocco italiano. Ed. Fagiolo, Marcello and Madonna, Maria Luisa. Roma: Gangemi, 1985. 51–62.Google Scholar
Larson, Orville K. “Spectacle in the Florentine Intermezzi.” Drama Survey 2 (1963): 344–52.Google Scholar
Lavin, Irving. Bernini and the Unity of the Visual Arts. New York: Oxford UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Lea, K. M. Italian Popular Comedy: A Study in the Commedia dell'Arte, 1560–1620, with Special Reference to the English Stage. 2 vols. London: Oxford UP, 1934.Google Scholar
Mariti, Luciano. Commedia ridicolosa: Comici di professione, dilettanti. Roma: Bulzoni, 1978.Google Scholar
Martucci, G. “Salvator Rosa nel personaggio di Formica.” Nuova antologia (1885): 641–58.Google Scholar
Pandolfi, Vito. La commedia dell'arte: Storia e testo. 6 vols. Firenze: Sansoni, 1957–61.Google Scholar
Perrucci, Andrea. Dell'arte rappresentativa premeditata ed all' improvviso. Ed. Bragaglia, Anton Giulio. Firenze: Sansoni, 1961.Google Scholar
Redfield, Robert. Peasant Society and Culture. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1956.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Dennis E. La stampa a Viterbo, ‘1488‘–1800. Firenze: Olschki, 1963.Google Scholar
Scala, Flaminio. Il teatro delle favole rappresentative, overo la ricreatione comica, boscareccia e tragica, divisa in cinquanta giornate. Venice, 1611. Ed. Marotti, Ferrucio. 2 vols. Milano: Polifilo, 1976.Google Scholar
Scala, Flaminio. Scenarios of the Commedia dell'Arte: Flaminio Scala's Il teatro delle favole rappresentative. Trans. Henry F. Salerno. New York: New York UP, 1967.Google Scholar
Sebillot, P. Gargantua dans les traditions populaires. Paris, 1883.Google Scholar
Taviani, Ferdinando, and Schino, Mirella. Il segreto della commedia dell'arte: La memoria delle compagnie italiane del XVI, XVII, e XVIII secolo. Firenze: Usher, 1982.Google Scholar
Tessari, Roberto. Commedia dell'arte: La maschera e l'ombra. Milano: Mursia, 1984.Google Scholar
Tessari, Roberto. La commedia dell'arte nel seicento: “Industria” e “arte giocosa” della civiltà barocca. Firenze: Olschki, 1969.Google Scholar
Toschi, Paolo. Le origini del teatro italiano. Torino: Einaudi, 1955.Google Scholar
Verucci, Virgilio. Li diversi linguaggi. Venice, 1627. Mariti 107–206.Google Scholar