Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:41:38.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beautiful Statues, Beautiful Men: The Abjection of Feminine Imagination in Lessing's Laokoon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Susan E. Gustafson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his Laokoon essay, Gotthold Ephraim Lessing concludes that “[b]ei uns scheinet sich die zarte Einbildungskraft der Mütter nur in Ungeheuern zu äuβern” ‘in modern times the susceptible imagination of mothers seems to express itself solely in monsters.‘ In contrast, masculine imagination yields beautiful statues, beautiful men, and subsequently harmonious cultures. The idealization of classical sculpture displaces the generative power of the mother, who, if not totally impotent, is the source of the fragmented, deformed body. The Laokoon text incorporates and abjects the fragmented body of the woman. It is ironic that she represents both the void and the only object capable of filling the subjective vacuum. Stable masculine subjectivity is contingent on the abjection of woman and yet unattainable without her recovery. Accordingly, the Laokoon is based on the abjection of the feminine while simultaneously stuffed full of fragments of the woman's body and imagination. Lessing's aesthetic project fosters the circumscription of feminine imagination by the myth of the unifying function of masculine fantasy.

Type
Cluster on the Poetic: From Euripides to Rich
Information
PMLA , Volume 108 , Issue 5 , October 1993 , pp. 1083 - 1097
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Barnett, Stuart. “Über die Grenzen: Semiotics and Subjectivity in Lessing's Hamburgische Dramaturgie.” German Quarterly 60 (1987): 407–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Udo. “Laokoon-Momente einer semiotischen Ästhetik.” Gebauer, Lessing-Projekt 59–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, Norman. “Intertextuality and Visual Poetics.” Style 22 (1988): 183–18.Google Scholar
Butler, E. M. The Tyranny of Greece over Germany. New York: Macmillan, 1935.Google Scholar
Fletcher, John, and Benjamin, Andrew, eds. Abjection, Melancholia, and Love: The Work of Julia Kristeva. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Gebauer, Gunter, ed. Das Lessing-Projekt. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebauer, Gunter, ed. “Symbolstrukturen und die Grenzen der Kunst. Zu Lessings Kritik der Darstellungsfähigkeit künstlerischer Symbole.” Gebauer, Lessing-Projekt 137–13.Google Scholar
Goethe, Goethe Johann Wolfgang. Werke Hamburger Ausgabe. Ed. Blumenthal, Lieselotte and Haufe, Eberhard. Vol. 5. München: Beck'sche, 1981.Google Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst H. Tributes. Oxford: Phaidon, 1984.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Clement. “Towards a Newer Laocoon.” Partisan Review 7 (1940): 216–310.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. “The Body of Signification.” Fletcher and Benjamin 80–103.Google Scholar
Gustafson, Susan E. “Windungen und Wendungen in Lessings Laokoon.” Aufklärung nach Lessing. Ed. Albrecht, Wolfgang, Fratzke, Dieter, and Schade, Richard. Kamenz: Lessing Museum, 1992. 21–36.Google Scholar
Heidsieck, Arnold. “Adam Smith's Influence on Lessing's View of Man and Society.” Lessing Yearbook 15 (1983): 125–12.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Sämtliche Werke. Ed. Suphan, Bernhard. Vol. 3. Berlin: Weidmannsche, 1878.Google Scholar
Hoesterey, Ingeborg. “Laokoon und Modernität. Eine Rettung.” Lessing Yearbook 15 (1983): 165–16.Google Scholar
Howard, William Guild. Laokoon. Lessing, Herder, Goethe: Selections. New York: Henry Holt, 1910.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Carol. “The Critical Performance of Lessing's Laokoon” MLN 102 (1987): 483–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. Roudiez, Leon S. Trans. Gorn, Thomas, Jardine, Alice, and Roudiez, . New York: Columbia UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. Roudiez, Leon S. New York: Columbia UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. Ecrits: A Selection. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Norton, 1977.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques L'éthique de la psychanalyse. Le séminaire, VII. Paris: Seuil, 1986.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Hamburgische Dramaturgie. Werke 2:9–506.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Laokoon…. Werke 3:10–188.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Werke in drei Bänden. Ed. Göpfert, Herbert G. 3 vols. München: Hanser, 1982.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, Noreen. “The An-Arche of Psychotherapy.” Fletcher and Benjamin 42–51.Google Scholar
Richter, Simon. Laocoon's Body and the Aesthetics of Pain: Winckelmann, Lessing, Herder, Moritz, and Goethe. Detroit: Wayne State UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Silverman, Kaja. The Acoustic Mirror: The Female Voice in Psychoanalysis and Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Stierle, Karlheinz. “Das bequeme Verhältnis. Lessings Laokoon und die Entdeckung des ästhetischen Mediums.” Gebauer, Lessing-Projekt 23–57.Google Scholar
Szarota, Elida Maria. Lessings Laokoon. Eine Kampfschrift für eine realistische Kunst und Poesie. Weimar: Arion, 1959.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. “Ästhetik und Semiotik im 18. Jahrhundert. G. E. Lessings Laokoon.” Gebauer, Lessing-Projekt 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuillemin, Jules. “Bemerkungen über Lessings Laokoon.” Gebauer, Lessing-Projekt 167–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellbery, David. Lessing's Laocoon: Semiotics and Aesthetics in the Age of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984.Google Scholar