Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:15:37.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barthes, Góngora, and Non-Sense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Abstract

A fragment in Roland Barthes par Roland Barthes suggests that any attempt to transgress the binary prison of male and female (active and passive) tends to invert the traditional terms without disrupting their oppressive and spurious authority. Barthes proposes a neutral and utopian “third term,” or “non-sense,” that will transcend transgression itself and that he identifies with a “happy” sexuality and a “Gongorine” text. The poetics of Golden Age Spain are underwritten by implicitly gendered conceptions of the rhetorical body: ornamental style, lyric genre, and Italianate ethos are associated with the “female” text and hence made subordinate to their “higher” male equivalents. In the Soledades Góngora stresses the “female” terms, but his usage may not be transgressive: generic confusion (sexual and textual) was already widespread elsewhere. He tends, rather, to a nomadic indeterminacy that displaces author as active origin and reader as passive recipient of authoritative and authoritarian meaning.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 101 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 82 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alonso, Dámaso. La lengua poética de Góngora. Madrid: CSIC, 1935.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Critique et vérité. Paris: Seuil, 1966.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Le degré zéro de l'écriture. Nouveaux essais critiques. Paris: Seuil, 1972.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. L'empire des signes. Genève: Skira, 1970.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Essais critiques. Paris: Seuil, 1964.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Leçon. Paris: Seuil, 1978.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. Paris: Seuil, 1957.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Le plaisir du texte. Paris: Seuil, 1973.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Roland Barthes par Roland Barthes. Paris: Seuil, 1980.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Sade, Fourier, Loyola. Paris: Seuil, 1971.Google Scholar
Beverley, John R. Aspects of Góngora's Soledades. Amsterdam: Benjamin, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beverley, John R. Introduction. Soledades. By Luis de Góngora. Madrid: Cátedra, 1979.Google Scholar
Gallego Morell, Antonio. Garcilaso de la Vega y sus comentaristas. 2nd ed. Madrid: Gredos, 1972.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. “Une poétique structurale?Tel Quel 7 (1961): 1319.Google Scholar
Góngora, Luis de. The Solitudes of Don Luis de Góngora. Trans. Wilson, Edward Meryon. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1965.Google Scholar
Gornall, J. F. G.Góngora's Soledades: ‘Alabanza de aldea’ without ‘Menosprecio de corte‘?Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 59 (1982): 2125.Google Scholar
Jones, Royston O.The Poetic Unity of the Soledades of Góngora.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 31 (1954): 189204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Susan. “On the Threshold of the Realist Novel: Gender and Genre in La gaviota.” PMLA 98 (1983): 323–40.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. Ecrits I. Paris: Seuil, 1966.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. The Renaissance Notion of Woman. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Marino, Giambattista. L'Adone. Ed. Ferrero, Giuseppe Guido. Torino: Einaudi, 1976.Google Scholar
Martínez Arancón, Ana. La batalla en torno a Góngora (selección de textes). Madrid: Bosch, 1978.Google Scholar
McKendrick, Melveena. Woman and Society in the Spanish Drama of the Golden Age. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1974.Google Scholar
Molho, Maurice. Semántica y poética (Góngora, Quevedo). Barcelona: Crítica, 1977.Google Scholar
Quintilian [Marcus Fabius Quintilianus]. Institutio oratoria. Trans. Butler, H. E. London: Loeb, 1922.Google Scholar
Salcedo Coronel, José García de. Soledades … comentadas. Madrid: Domingo González, 1636.Google Scholar
Scaliger, Julius Caesar. Poetices libri septem. Lyons: Vincentius, 1561.Google Scholar
Smith, Paul Julian. “Descriptio pueri: Praise of the Young Hero in Some Poets of Renaissance Spain and Italy.” Studi secenteschi 24 (1983): 5766.Google Scholar
Tasso, Torquato. Discorsi dell'arte poetica e del poema heroico. Ed. Poma, Luigi. Bari: Laterza, 1964.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. “L'origine des genres.” Les genres du discours. Paris: Seuil, 1978. 4460.Google Scholar
Vilanova, Antonio. Las fuentes y los temas del Polifemo de Góngora. 2 vols. Madrid: CSIC, 1957.Google Scholar
Vilanova, Antonio. “El peregrino de amor en las Soledades de Góngora.” Estudios dedicados a Menéndez Pidal. 7 vols. Madrid: CSIC, 1952. 3: 421–60.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Bernard. A History of Literary Criticism in the Italian Renaissance. 2 vols. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1961.Google Scholar
Woods, M. J. The Poet and the Natural World in the Age of Góngora. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1978.Google Scholar