Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T13:24:51.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Art and Love in the Confessions of Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Mark J. Temmer
Mark J. Temmer*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are few scholars who have not despaired of settling the controversies that relate to Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Well known during his lifetime, these disputes have become legends which obscure the real ambiguities of his existence and achievement. In this respect, Rousseau belongs to the family of Montaigne and Gide, whose lengthy confessions have rarely been judged in an unbiased manner. It is, to be sure, the very purpose of such avowals to preclude indifference, and, in the case of Rousseau, there is little sense in trying to evade the haunting and problematical implications of his autobiography. The man and artist must first be approached not only for the sake of their respective importance, but also because the Discourses, the Social Contract, and the Emile are transpositions and solutions of their inner conflicts. At present, there is agreement on at least this one point, and many philosophers and critics have sought to find the principle which would reveal the true motives of a man who swore to tell the truth. However, few of their commentaries on the Confessions and the Rêveries du promeneur solitaire envisage the fundamental question of the autobiographical genre itself, namely: How does the great autobiographer succeed in making credible and convincing the story of his life, and what are the stylistic means by which he imposes this vision on others?

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , June 1958 , pp. 215 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mme de Warens (Paris, 1914), pp. 26, 27.

2 J. J. Rousseau, Les rêveries du promeneur solitaire, ed. Marcel Raymond (Geneva, 1948), pp. 56, 57. Concerning the relationship between Rousseau and Mme de Warens, see François Mugnier, Madame de Warens el J. J. Rousseau (Paris, 1891); Hélène Pittard, “J. J. Rousseau et Mme de Warens,” Revue des deux Mondes (1 Oct. 1924); A. Schinz, Etat présent des travaux sur J.-J. Rousseau (Paris and New York, 1941).

3 Jean-Jacques—En marge des confessions (Paris, 1948), i, 10.

4 Rousseau, Les confessions, ed. Georges van Bever, 3 vols. (Paris, 1946), i, 9 (my translation). Hereafter parenthetical references in the text to volume and page or page alone will be to this edition.

5 The problem of time in the Confessions has been studied by Poulet and Georges Gusdorf. The former's book, Etudes sur le temps humain (Paris, 1950), has an excellent chapter on Rousseau's experience of time, while the latter's treatise, Mémoire el personne, 2 vols. (Paris, 1950), contains an interesting paragraph on Rousseau's memory. These two critics, however, hardly concern themselves with the time of the artist, that is, illusory or artificial duration.

6 Œuvres complètes, ed. V. D. Musset-Pathay, xiii (1823–26), 50, 51.

7 Mme de Warens, p. 111.

8 Rousseau, Œuvres, xiii, 50.

9 Rêveries du promeneur solitaire, 5e promenade, p. 84.

10 Cf. “les sentimens ne se décrivent bien que par leurs effets.”

11 Rêveries du promeneur solitaire, 8e promenade, p. 131.

12 Ibid., 10e promenade, p. 162.

13 Ibid., p. 163.

14 Ibid., p. 164 (my trans.). These, perhaps, are the last words written by Rousseau.