Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:50:11.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anticipating Alienation: Beowulf and the Intrusion of Literacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Michael R. Near
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Implicit in Beowulf's thematic involvement with language is a marked and persistent hostility toward the epistemological foundation underpinning the practice of literacy. While the poem seems to acknowledge the psychological posture conditioned by, or at least compatible with, literate practices, the acknowledgment characterizes that posture as a clear, direct threat to the ordering structures—and thus to the basic survival—of the poem's central system of personal interdependencies. Beowulf confronts the psychological demands of the reading experience by persistently reaffirming those idioms of speech and patterns of interaction that require the open immediacy of spoken exchange. The confrontations set in conflict not simply the characters of the poem but the psychological structures that the characters epitomize and thus the linguistic practices most compatible with those structures. (MRN)

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 108 , Issue 2 , March 1993 , pp. 320 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Auerbach, Erich Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Trask, Willard. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Josephine “Wealtheow through the Filter of Nineteenth-Century Germany: Cultural Influences on Frederick Klaeber's Editorial Sensibilities.” Annual Meeting of the Medieval Inst.' Kalamazoo, 11 May 1991.Google Scholar
Bonjour, A The Digressions in Beowulf. Medium Aevum Monograph Series 5. Oxford: Blackwell, 1965.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter Augustine of Hippo: A Biography. Berkeley: U of California P, 1984.Google Scholar
Clemoes, Peter “Action in Beowulf and Our Perception of It.” Old English Poetry: Essays in Style. Ed. Calder, Daniel. Berkeley: U of California P, 1979. 147–14.Google Scholar
Crosby, Ruth “Oral Delivery in the Middle Ages.” Speculum 11 (1936): 88–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, Philip “Allegory and Invention: Levels of Meaning in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric.” The Classics in the Middle Ages. Ed. Bernardo, Aldo S. and Levin, Saul. Papers of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies. Binghamton: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, 1990. 113–11.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul Allegories of Reading: Figurai Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven: Yale UP, 1979.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul “The Rhetoric of Temporality.” Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. Theory and History of Literature 7. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1983. 187–228.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chak-ravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques “Signature, Event, Context.” Trans. Samuel Weber and Jeffrey Mehlman. Glyph: Johns Hopkins Textual Studies 1 (1977): 172–17.Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. Talbot Speaking of Chaucer. New York: Norton, 1970.Google Scholar
Fineman, Joel “The Structure of Allegorical Desire.” Allegory and Representation: Selected Papers from the English Institute, 1979–80. Ns 5. Ed. Stephen J. Greenblatt. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1981. 26–60.Google Scholar
Foley, John Miles The Theory of Oral Composition. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Frantzen, Allen J Desire for Origins: New Language, Old English, and Teaching the Tradition. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godden, M. R “Anglo-Saxons on the Mind.” Learning and Literature in Anglo-Saxon England: Studies Presented to Peter Clemoes on the Occasion of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Ed. Lapidge, Michael and Gneuss, Helmut. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985. 271–27.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Margaret The Mode and Meaning of Beowulf. London: Athlone, 1970.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack The Domestication of the Savage Mind. New York: Cambridge UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack The Interface between the Written and the Oral. New York: Cambridge UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Stanley “The Formulaic Expression of the Theme of ‘Exile’ in Anglo-Saxon Poetry.” Speculum 30 (1955): 200–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppé, Bernard Doctrine and Poetry: Augustine's Influence on Old English Poetry. New York: University, 1959.Google Scholar
Jager, Eric “Speech and the Chest in Old English Poetry: Orality or Pectorality?” Speculum 65 (1990): 845–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaske, Robert “Sapientia et Fortitudo as the Controlling Theme of Beowulf.'” An Anthology of Beowulf Criticism. Ed. Nicholson, Lewis. Notre Dame: Notre Dame UP, 1963. 269–310.Google Scholar
Klaeber, Fr., ed Beowulf. Beowulf and The Fight at Finnsburg. 3rd ed. Lexington: Heath, 1950. 1–120.Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth Literacy and Power in Anglo-Saxon Literature. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1991.Google Scholar
Michaels, Walter Benn “The Interpreter's Self: Peirce on the Cartesian Subject.” Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-structuralism. Ed. Tompkins, Jane P. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1980. 185–200.Google Scholar
Niles, John D. Beowulf. The Poem and Its Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1983.Google Scholar
O'Keeffe, Katherine O'Brien “Orality and the Developing Text of Caedmon's Hymn.” Speculum 62 (1987): 1–20.Google Scholar
O'Keeffe, Katherine O'Brien Visible Song: Transitional Literacy in Old English Verse. Cambridge Studies in Anglo-Saxon England 4. New York: Cambridge UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter Orality and Literacy. New York: Methuen, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1969.Google Scholar
Overing, Gillian R “Nebuchadnezzar's Conversion in the Old English Daniel: A Psychological Portrait.” Papers on Language and Literature 20 (1984): 3–14.Google Scholar
Overing, Gillian R “Swords and Signs: A Semiotic Perspective on Beowulf.” American Journal of Semiotics 5 (1987): 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renoir, Alain “Point of View and Design for Terror in Beowulf.” Neophilologische Mitteilungen 63 (1962): 154–15.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W. Jr A Preface to Chaucer: Studies in Medieval Perspective. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, E. G “Old English Poetic Diction and the Interpretation of The Wanderer, The Seafarer, and The Penitant's Prayer.” Essential Articles for the Study of Old English Poetry. Ed. Bessinger, Jess B. and Kahrl, Stanley J. New York: Archon, 1968.Google Scholar
Stock, Brian The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Thormann, Janet “The Body of the Mother in Beowulf.“ MLA Convention. Chicago, 29 Dec. 1990.Google Scholar
Zumthor, Paul Speaking of the Middle Ages. Trans. White, Sarah. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1986.Google Scholar