Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:43:57.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anthropocene and Empire: Discourse Networks of the Human Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

James Jaehoon Lee  and
Joshua Beckelhimer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scientists have recently proposed 1610 as a candidate for the first year of the new geological epoch known as the Anthropocene. They pinpoint the rise of European colonialism and the global movement of life among ecosystems it precipitated as the triggers for measurable changes in the earth system. We used digital humanities methods to mine historical archives to evaluate the relations among colonialism, early modern globalism, and the origins of the Anthropocene. We suggest that the Anthropocene was initiated by a premodern earth system that defined life across the globe in spatial terms, furthering the goals of empire—a regime of biopower that has not been adequately acknowledged in debates on the Anthropocene. We propose that the idea of empire, rather than Enlightenment narratives of progress and scientific modernity, must be considered in our definition of the Anthropocene. (JJL and JB)

Type
Special Topic: Varieties of Digital Humanities
Information
PMLA , Volume 135 , Issue 1: Special Topic Varieties of Digital Humanities , January 2020 , pp. 110 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 James Jaehoon and Joshua Beckelhimer

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alingham, William. A Short Account, of the Nature and Use of Maps as Also Some Short Discourses of the Properties of the Earth. London, 1698.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Of the Citie of God. Translated by Healy, John, London, 1610.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The Essays or Counsels, Ciuill and Morall. London, 1625.Google Scholar
Behn, Aphra. Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slave: A True History. London, 1688.Google Scholar
Bland, Edward. The Discovery of New Brittaine. London, 1651.Google Scholar
Blei, David M., et al. “Latent Dirichlet Allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 3, Jan. 2003, pp. 993–1022.Google Scholar
Boyd-Graber, Jordan, et al. “Applications of Topic Models.” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, Vol. 20, No. 20, 2017, pp. 1–154.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. The General History of the Air. London, 1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2009, pp. 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, Alfred W. The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003.Google Scholar
Da, Nan Z. “The Computational Case against Computational Literary Studies.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2019, pp. 601–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Heather, and Todd, Zoe. “On the Importance of a Date; or, Decolonizing the Anthropocene.” ACME: An International E-journal for Critical Geographies, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2017, pp. 761–80.Google Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. Through Other Continents: American Literature across Deep Time. Princeton UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Ellis, Erle, et al. “Involve Social Scientists in Defining the Anthropocene.” Nature, Vol. 540, No. 7632, 2016, pp. 192–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Peter, and Hall, Kim F. “‘A New Scholarly Song’: Rereading Early Modern Race.” Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feerick, Jean. “Spenser, Race, and Ire-land.” English Literary Renaissance, Vol. 32, 2002, pp. 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filo, Gina. “‘A Scarce Seen Thing She Glides’: Blackness and Miscegenation in Eldred Revett's Poems.” ELH, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2019, pp. 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd-Wilson, Mary. “Temperature, Temperance, and Racial Difference in Ben Jonson's The Masque of Blackness.” English Literary Renaissance, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1998, pp. 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Routledge, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grent, William. A New and Accurate Map of the World Drawne According to the Truest Descriptions, Latest Discoueries, and Best Obseruations That Haue Been Made by English or Strangers. London, 1625.Google Scholar
Hariot, Thomas. A Briefe and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia. London, 1588.Google Scholar
Havers, G., and Davies, John. Another Collection of Philosophical Conferences of the French Virtuosi upon Questions of All Sorts for the Improving of Natural Knowledg Made in the Assembly of the Beaux Esprits at Paris by the Most Ingenious Persons of That Nation. London, 1665.Google Scholar
Henshaw, Joseph. Meditations Miscellaneous, Holy and Humane. London, 1637.Google Scholar
Hume, Patrick. Annotations on Milton's Paradise Lost. London, 1695.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Sujata. Shades of Difference: Mythologies of Skin Color in Early Modern England. U of Pennsylvania P, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Lauren. “Distant Reading after Moretti.” Arcade: Literature, the Humanities, and the World, 10 Jan. 2018, arcade.stanford.edu/blogs/distant-reading-after-moretti.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. “Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene.” New Literary History, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2014, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Simon L., and Maslin, Mark A. “Defining the Anthropocene.” Nature, Vol. 519, No. 7542, 2015, pp. 171–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, Thomas, translator. Virgil's Georgicks Englished. London, 1628.Google Scholar
Mikolov, Tomas, et al. “Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and Their Compositionality.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, no. 26, 2013, papers.nips.cc/paper/5021-distributed-representations-of-words-and-phrases-and-their-compositionality.pdf.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Paradise Lost: A Poem in Twelve Books. London, 1674.Google Scholar
Moxon, Joseph. Mathematicks Made Easy; or, A Mathematical Dictionary. London, 1679.Google Scholar
Nowviskie, Bethany. “Digital Humanities in the Anthropocene.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2015, pp. i4-i15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, Andrew. Enumerations: Data and Literary Study. U of Chicago P, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, Ayesha. The Worldmakers: Global Imagining in Early Modern Europe. U of Chicago P, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusanov, Alexander, et al. “Trends in Anesthesiology Research: A Machine Learning Approach to Theme Discovery and Summarization.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Open, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2018, pp. 283–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Rymer, Thomas. A Short View of Tragedy. London, 1693.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Benjamin M. “Words Alone: Dismantling Topic Models in the Humanities.” Journal of Digital Humanities, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2012, journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-1/words-alone-by-benjamin-m-schmidt/.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tempest. Edited by Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine, Folger Shakespeare Library, 2019. Folger Digital Texts, 2019, www.folgerdigitaltexts.org/?chapter=5&play=Tmp.Google Scholar
Shore, Daniel. Cyberformalism: Histories of Linguistic Forms in the Digital Archive. Johns Hopkins UP, 2018.Google Scholar
Sinclair, George. The Principles of Astronomy and Navigation. Edinburgh, 1688.Google Scholar
Stewart, Alan. “‘Euery Soyle to Mee Is Naturall’: Figuring Denization in William Haughton's English-men for My Money.” Renaissance Drama, Vol. 35, 2006, pp. 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, Kyle. “Indigenous Climate Change Studies: Indigenizing Futures, Decolonizing the Anthropocene.” English Language Notes, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2017, pp. 153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, Kyle “Our Ancestors' Dystopia Now: Indigenous Conservation and the Anthropocene.” The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities, edited by Heise, Ursula K. et al., Routledge, 2017, pp. 222–31.Google Scholar
Williams, Edward. Virgo Triumphans; or, Virginia in Generall, but the South Part Therof in Particular Including the Fertile Carolan. London, 1650.Google Scholar