No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2020
In a previous paper the syllabic quantity of twenty-five lines of Milton's Paradise Lost was discussed. In that paper it was shown that for three different readers approximately 90% of the syllables standing in the metrically stressed position were longer than the other syllables in the same foot in the unstressed position. In the following study it is my purpose to consider syllabic duration in lyric verse of different metres. The first two selections are iambic. They were read by I and Ka respectively, both instructors in vocal expression in western universities. All times are given in tenths and one-hundredths of a second; the times of pauses are in parenthesis.
1 An objective study of syllabic quantity in English verse in these Publications, xxxiii, pp. 396 ff.
2 The instrument into which the readers spoke the lines is one devised by Professor John F. Shepard of the University of Michigan. It consists of various tambours covered with mica and rubber and mounted with pointers which record the vibrations and outflow of air during speech. The pointers remove the soot from a revolving band of smoked paper, writing thus the various vibrations and curves which represent speech. From records thus made it is possible to determine in most cases with great precision the limits of syllabic duration. Since voiced sounds may blend, it is not always possible to determine exactly the limits of syllables one of which ends and the other of which begins with a voiced sound. In doubtful cases I took the average time of the same syllable found in other places in the material studied but standing between consonants, or made up sentences containing syllables like those under consideration. All cases of this sort are indicated as doubtful.
3 Doubtful division.
4 The second stanza was taken rather than the first, since the fourth line of the first stanza is metrically anomalous. The refrain was omitted since it, also, on account of pauses and substitutions is not a normal iambic line. For the curious I will, however, give the results here.
These lines read, as they were very beautifully, make an interesting study on account of the pauses and time variations. In all three stanzas of the poem, ech of echoes is the shorter syllable. In two or three instances dy of dying is the shorter, because, undoubtedly, of the pause.
5 Doubtful division.
7 Doubtful division.
8 The two lines might be scanned as follows:
They probably were thus read.
9 For this line a better division is
with the first unit a spondee and the second a bacchic. The two feet should be excluded from the results.