No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Aggregation, Public Criticism, and the History of Reading Big Data
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2020
Abstract
This essay traces the history of ideas behind the critical methods of distant reading and macroanalysis, modes of criticism enabled by the rise of the science, media, and technology of aggregation. I situate these methods in the intellectual shifts marked by the advent of modern polling practices, computational census technologies, post-1945 marketing strategies, and other methods of analyzing an aggregated public. Drawing on work by Sarah E. Igo, Mary Poovey, Bill Kovarik, and others, I demonstrate that the ideas legitimated through these shifts in technology and public sentiment are fundamental to the types of claims made in the “big data” digital humanities. This attention to intellectual history raises important problems and qualifications for big data methods like distant reading, particularly regarding their underlying assumptions about the publics of literary history.
- Type
- Special Topic: Cultures of Reading
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2018