Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:22:56.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“What Is a Classic?”: International Literary Criticism and the Classic Question

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Ankhi Mukherjee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Starting with two twentieth-century lectures (both titled “What Is a Classic?”), delivered by T. S. Eliot and J. M. Coetzee forty-seven years apart, this essay looks at the ontology of the classic in particular and canon formation in general in the globalized and multicultural field of twenty-first-century English studies. It focuses on the agonistic process through which the classic assumes form and coherence and on the position of the critic making a claim about the classic. The essay evaluates the importance of this contestation of literary value for interlopers and latecomers to the Western canon, concluding that the “perduring” classic is, perhaps, the invention of the outsider. With close attention to the unstable relation between the classic as preeminently European or national and the classic as trans- or international, the essay seeks to reclaim the foundational concept of the classic for world literature, postcolonial studies, and literary criticism in an international frame.

Type
Literary History, Literary Revision, Literary Performance
Information
PMLA , Volume 125 , Issue 4: Special Topic Literary Criticism for the Twenty-First Century , October 2010 , pp. 1026 - 1042
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ackroyd, Peter. T. S. Eliot: A Life. New York: Simon, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Charles, Altieri. Canons and Consequences: Reflections on the Ethical Force of Imaginative Ideals. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Charles, Altieri. “The Hermeneutics of Literary Indeterminacy: A Dissent from the New Orthodoxy.” New Literary History 10.1 (1978): 71–99. Print.Google Scholar
Arjun, Appadurai. “Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination.” Globalization. Ed. Appadurai. Durham: Duke UP, 2000. 1–20. Print.Google Scholar
Derek, Attridge. J. M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Reading: Literature in the Event. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Ian, Baucom. “Globalit. Inc.; or, The Cultural Logic of Global Literary Studies.” PMLA 116.1 (2001): 158–72. Print.Google Scholar
Harold, Bloom. The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. New York: Riverhead, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Pierre, Bourdieu. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. New York: Routledge, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Pascale, Casanova. “Literature as a World.” New Left Review 31 (2005): 1–11. Print.Google Scholar
Pascale, Casanova. The World Republic of Letters. Trans. M. B. Debevoise. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Dipesh, Chakrabarty. “Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for ‘Indian’ Pasts?” Representations 37.1 (1992): 1–26. Print.Google Scholar
Joe, Cleary. “The World Literary System: Atlas and Epitaph.” Rev. of The World Republic of Letters, by Pascal Casanova. Field Day Review 2 (2006): 196–219. Print.Google Scholar
Coetzee, J. M. Boyhood: Scenes from Provincial Life. New York: Penguin, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Coetzee, J. M. Diary of a Bad Year. London: Vintage, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Coetzee, J. M. “What Is a Classic?” Stranger Shores: Essays, 1986–1999. London: Vintage, 1992. 1–19. Print.Google Scholar
Coetzee, J. M. Youth: Scenes from Provincial Life II. London: Secker, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Antoine, Compagnon. “Sainte-Beuve and the Canon.” Modern Language Notes 110.5 (1995): 1188–99. Print.Google Scholar
David, Damrosch. What Is World Literature? Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Donald, Davie. “Virgil's Presence in Ezra Pound and Others.” Virgil in a Cultural Tradition: Essays to Celebrate the Bimillenium. Ed. Cardwell, Richard A. and Hamilton, Janet. Nottingham: U of Nottingham P, 1986. 134–46. Print.Google Scholar
Jacques, Derrida. “Geopsychoanalysis: ‘… And the Rest of the World.‘” Psychoanalysis and Race. Ed. Lane, Christopher. New York: Columbia UP, 1998. 65–91. Print.Google Scholar
Jacques, Derrida. “Onto-theology of National-Humanism: Prolegomena to a Hypothesis.” Oxford Literary Review 14.1 (1992): 3–23. Print.Google Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. Through Other Continents: American Literature across Deep Time. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Terry, Eagleton. Exiles and Emigrés: Studies in Modern Literature. London: Chatto, 1970. Print.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. “The Function of Criticism.” Eliot, Selected Essays 23–37.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. Selected Essays. London: Faber, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” Eliot, Selected Essays 13–23.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. “Virgil and the Christian World.” On Poetry and Poets. New York: Farrar, 1957. 121–31. Print.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. “What Is a Classic?”: An Address Delivered before the Virgil Society on the 16th of October 1944. London: Faber, 1945. Print.Google Scholar
English, James F. The Economy of Prestige: Prizes, Awards, and the Circulation of Cultural Value. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2005. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Fortieth Anniversary.” The Man Booker Prize. Booker Prize Foundation, n.d. Web. 23 Aug. 2010.Google Scholar
Sigmund, Freud. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. New York: Norton, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Lyndall, Gordon. T. S. Eliot: An Imperfect Life. New York: Norton, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
John, Guillory. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Ted, Hughes. A Dancer to God: Tributes to T. S. Eliot. London: Faber, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Frank, Kermode. The Classic. London: Faber, 1975. Print.Google Scholar
Frank, Kermode. “T. S. Eliot on Poetry.” Rev. of On Poetry and Poets, by T. S. Eliot. International Literary Annual 1 (1958): 134. Print.Google Scholar
Knight, W. F. Jackson. Roman Vergil. New York: Barnes, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan Brody. “The Making of the English Canon.” PMLA 112.5 (1997): 1087–101. Print.Google Scholar
Colleen, Lamos. Deviant Modernism: Sexual and Textual Errancy in T. S. Eliot, James Joyce, and Marcel Proust. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Franco, Moretti. “The Slaughterhouse of Literature.” Modern Language Quarterly 61.1 (2000): 207–27. Print.Google Scholar
Marjorie, Perloff. Twenty-First-Century Modernism: The “New” Poetics. Malden: Blackwell, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Christopher, Prendergast. The Classic: Sainte-Beuve and the Nineteenth-Century Culture Wars. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Gareth, Reeves. T. S. Eliot: A Virgilian Poet. London: Macmillan, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Salman, Rushdie. Ground beneath Her Feet. London: Vintage, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Edward, Said. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Knopf, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Edward, Said. The World, the Text, and the Critic. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, Augustin. “De la tradition en littérature et dans quel sens il la faut entendre.” Causeries du lundi. 3rd ed. Vol. 15. Paris: Levy, 1860. 356–82. Print.Google Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, Augustin. “Qu'est-ce qu'un classique?” Causeries du lundi. 3rd ed. Vol. 3. Paris: Levy, 1850. 38–55. Print.Google Scholar
Gayatri, Spivak. “The Burden of English.” The Lie of the Land: English Literary Studies in India. Ed. Rajan, Rajeswari Sunder. Delhi: Oxford UP, 1992. 275–99. Print.Google Scholar
Gayatri, Spivak. Death of a Discipline. Calcutta: Seagull, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Gayatri, Spivak. Outside in the Teaching Machine. New York: Routledge, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Gayatri, Spivak. “Scattered Speculation on the Question of Value.” The Spivak Reader. Ed. Landry, Donna and Mclean, Gerald. New York: Routledge, 1996. 107–40. Print.Google Scholar
“Tears, Tiffs and Triumphs.” Guardian 6 Sept. 2008, rev. sec.: 2+. Print.Google Scholar
Helen, Vendler. Coming of Age as a Poet: Milton, Keats, Eliot, Plath. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Watson, E. Porges. “Virgil and T. S. Eliot.” Virgil in a Cultural Tradition: Essays to Celebrate the Bimillenium. Ed. Cardwell, Richard A. and Hamilton, Janet. Nottingham: U of Nottingham P, 1986. 115–33. Print.Google Scholar