Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:20:57.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“The Situation of the Looker-On”: Gender, Narration, and Gaze in Wuthering Heights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Abstract

In its frequent attention to visual acts, Wuthering Heights explores the sexual politics of the gaze. Not only does Bronte's novel make the gaze important thematically (as both a psychosexual phenomenon and a means of surveillance), it also suggests that narration itself is dependent on and produced by a gaze. But through its treatment of its two narrators and of Hareton and the second Catherine as gazing subjects, the novel suggests that there are limits to the power of the gaze to objectify, appropriate, and control. Thus Wuthering Heights anticipates questions that feminist theory has been asking about a possible “female gaze” and provides a feminist context for thinking about the visual metaphors pervading post-Jamesian theories of the novel.

Type
Victorian Cluster
Information
PMLA , Volume 105 , Issue 5 , October 1990 , pp. 1029 - 1041
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. “Emily Brontë in and out of Her Time.” Genre 15 (1982): 243–64.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M.M.The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981.Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke. Narratology: Introduction to the Study of Narrative. Trans. van Boheemen, Christine. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1985.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. A Future for Astyanax: Character and Desire in Literature. Boston: Little, 1976.Google Scholar
Brontë, Emily. Wuthering Heights. 1847. New York: Norton, 1972.Google Scholar
Brown, Helen Gurley. Sex and the Single Girl. New York: Pocket, 1962.Google Scholar
Caws, Mary Ann. Reading Frames in Modern Fiction. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cixous, Hélène. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Trans. Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen. Signs 1 (1976): 875–94. Rpt. in New French Feminisms. Ed. Marks, Elaine and de Courtivron, Isabelle. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1980. 245–64.Google Scholar
Copjec, Joan. “The Delirium of Clinical Perfection.” Oxford Literary Review 8 (1986): 5765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lauretis, Teresa. Alice Doesn't: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Doane, Mary Ann. “Film and the Masquerade: Theorising the Female Spectator.” Screen 23.3–4 (1982): 7487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “Medusa's Head.” 1940. The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Ed. trans, and. James Strachey. Vol. 18. London: Hogarth, 1955. 273–74. 24 vols. 1953–74.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Trans. Lewin, Jane E. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra, and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Heath, Stephen. “Difference.” Screen 19.3 (1978): 51112.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. Ann.Women and Film: Both Sides of the Camera. New York: Methuen, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavanagh, James. Emily Brontë. London: Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. “Of the Gaze as Objet Petit a.” 1973. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Ed. Miller, Jacques-Alain. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Norton, 1981. 57119.Google Scholar
Macovski, Michael S.Wuthering Heights and the Rhetoric of Interpretation.” ELH 54 (1987): 363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Wallace. Recent Theories of Narrative. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1986.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Terence 'The Incompetent Narrators of Wuthering Heights.“ Modern Language Quarterly 42 (1981): 4864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, Michael. The Origins of the English Novel 1600–1740. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Miller, D.A.The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy K.Subject to Change: Reading Feminist Writing. New York: Columbia UP, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrelay, Michèle. “Inquiry into Femininity.” Trans. Parveen Adams. French Feminist Thought: A Reader. Ed. Toril, Moi. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987. 227–49.Google Scholar
Mulvey, Laura. “Afterthoughts … Inspired by Duel in the Sun.” Framework 15–17 (1981): 1225.Google Scholar
Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16.3 (1975): 618.Google Scholar
Newman, Beth. “Narratives of Seduction and the Seductions of Narrative: The Frame Structure of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.” ELH 53 (1986): 141–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, E., and Radford, M.A., eds. The Encyclopedia of Superstition. 1947. Rev. Christina Hole Chester Springs: Dufour, 1961.Google Scholar
Russo, Mary. “Female Grotesques: Carnival and Theory.” Feminist Studies / Critical Studies. Ed. de Lauretis, Teresa. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1986. 213–29.Google Scholar
Seltzer, Mark. Henry James and the Art of Power. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Shunami, Gideon. “The Unreliable Narrator in Wuthering Heights.” Nineteenth Century Fiction 27 (1973): 449–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Kaja. The Subject of Semiotics. New York: Oxford UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800. New York: Harper, 1977.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. Introduction to Poetics. Trans. Howard, Richard. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1981.Google Scholar
Watt, Ian. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Berkeley: U of California P, 1957.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. To the Lighthouse. New York: Harcourt, 1927.Google Scholar
Yaeger, Patricia. Honey-Mad Women: Emancipatory Strategies in Women's Writing. New York: Columbia UP, 1988.Google Scholar