Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T10:49:07.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sacvan Bercovitch, Stanley Cavell, and the Romance Theory of American Fiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Emily Miller Budick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two questions posed by recent developments in literary theory are whether a tradition of American romance fiction exists and, if so, whether we want to continue to define it in the terms that have prevailed in literary criticism over the last thirty-five years. After briefly reviewing some features of the contemporary conversation concerning the theory of American romance, this essay puts into play two important figures in that conversation—Sacvan Bercovitch and Stanley Cavell—in an attempt to develop a new interpretive model for romance fiction. Finally, through certain of Cavell's ideas about Emerson, the essay reads a moment in Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter, which is crucial to Bercovitch's recent reinterpretation of the book, and attempts to clarify what, perhaps, constitutes the enduring power of the romance tradition.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 107 , Issue 1: Special Topic: Theory of Literary History , January 1992 , pp. 78 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Arac, Jonathan “The Politics of The Scarlet Letter.” Bercovitch and Jehlen 247–24.Google Scholar
Baym, Nina “Concepts of the Romance in Hawthorne's America.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 38 (1984): 426–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Michael Davitt The Development of American Romance: The Sacrifice of Relation. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Bell, Michael Davitt Hawthorne and the Historical Romance of New England. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Millicent “The Obliquity of Signs: The Scarlet Letter.” Critical Essays on Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter. Ed. David B. Kesterton. Boston: Hall, 1988. 157–15.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan The American Jeremiad. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1978.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan “The A-politics of Ambiguity in The Scarlet Letter.” New Literary History 19 (1988): 629–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan “Hawthorne's A-morality of Compromise.” Representations 24 (1988): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan “The Problem of Ideology in American Literary History.” Critical Inquiry 12 (1986): 631–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan The Puritan Origins of the American Self. New Haven: Yale UP, 1975.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan, and Jehlen, Myra, eds Ideology and Classic American Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Bewley, Maurice The Eccentric Design: Form in the Classic American Novel. New York: Columbia UP, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brant, Robert L “Hawthorne and Melville.” American Literature 30 (1958): 366.Google Scholar
Brodhead, Richard Hawthorne, Melville, and the Novel. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1976.Google Scholar
Brodhead, Richard The School of Hawthorne. New York: Oxford UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Budick, Emily Miller Fiction and Historical Consciousness: The American Romance Tradition. New Haven: Yale UP, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budick, Emily Miller “Hester's Skepticism, Hawthorne's Faith; or, What Does a Woman Doubt?” New Literary History 22 (1991): 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Sharon The Corporeal Self: Allegories of the Body in Melville and Hawthorne. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Carton, Evan The Rhetoric of American Romance: Dialectic and Identity in Emerson, Dickinson, Roe, and Hawthorne. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley “Aversive Thinking: Emersonian Representations in Heidegger and Nietzsche.” Cavell, Conditions 33–63.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley “Being Odd, Getting Even (Descartes, Emerson, Poe).” Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought. Ed. Heller, T. C., Sosna, M., and Wellbery, D. E. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1986. 278–312. Rpt. in In Quest of the Ordinary: Lines of Skepticism and Romanticism. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988. 105–10.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley “Hope against Hope.” American Poetry Review. Jan.-Feb. 1986: 9–13. Rpt. in Cavell, Conditions 129–12.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley The Senses of Walden. New York: Viking, 1972.Google Scholar
Chase, Richard The American Novel and Its Tradition. New York: Doubleday, 1957.Google Scholar
Clark, Robert History and Myth in American Fiction, 1823–52. New York: St. Martin's, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coale, Samuel Chase In Hawthorne's Shadow: American Romance from Melville to Mailer. Lexington: U of Kentucky P, 1985.Google Scholar
Colacurcio, Michael J The Province of Piety: Moral History in Hawthorne's Early Tales. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Crews, Frederick “Whose American Renaissance?” New York Review of Books 27 Oct. 1988: 68–81.Google Scholar
Dauber, Kenneth The Idea of Authorship in America: Democratic Poetics from Franklin to Melville. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1990.Google Scholar
Dekker, George The American Historical Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, George “The Genealogy of American Romance.” ESQ: A Journal of the American Renaissance 35 (1989): 69–83.Google Scholar
Dryden, Edgar The Form of American Romance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Eigner, Edwin M The Metaphysical Novel in England and America: Dickens, Bulwer, Melville, and Hawthorne. Berkeley: U of California P, 1978.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo “Self-Reliance.” The Selected Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Introd. Brooks Atkinson. New York: Modern Library, 1940. 145–14.Google Scholar
Feidelson, Charles Jr Symbolism and American Literature. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1953.Google Scholar
Fischer, Michael Stanley Cavell and Literary Skepticism. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1989.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Fisher, Philip Hard Facts: Setting and Form in the American Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Michael T American Romanticism and the Marketplace. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, Michael T The Middle Way: Puritanism and Ideology in American Romantic Fiction. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Girgus, Sam B The Law of the Heart: Individualism and the Modern Self in American Literature. Austin: U of Texas P, 1979.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, Nathaniel The Scarlet Letter. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1962. Vol. 1 of The Centenary Edition of the Works of Nathaniel Hawthorne. Ed. William Charvat et al.Google Scholar
Irwin, John American Hieroglyphics: The Symbol of the Egyptian Hieroglyphics in the American Renaissance. New Haven: Yale UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Jehlen, Myra American Incarnation: The Individual, the Nation, and the Continent. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, James H “The Hive of Subtlety: ‘Benito Cereno’ and the Liberal Hero.” Bercovitch and Jehlen 352–35.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Annette The Lay of the Land: Metaphor as Experience in American Life and Letters. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1975.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R The Great Tradition: George Eliot, Henry James, Joseph Conrad. New York: Anchor-Doubleday, 1954.Google Scholar
Levin, Harry The Power of Blackness: Hawthorne, Poe, Melville. London: Faber, 1958.Google Scholar
Levine, Robert S Conspiracy and Romance: Studies in Brockden Brown, Cooper, Hawthorne, and Melville. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. W. B The American Adam: Innocence, Tragedy, and Tradition in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1955.Google Scholar
Lopex, Michael “De-transcendentalizing Emerson.” ESQ: A Journal of the American Renaissance 34 (1988): 77–139.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, F. O American Renaissance: Art and Expression in the Age of Emerson and Whitman. London: Oxford UP, 1941.Google Scholar
McWilliams, John P. Jr Hawthorne, Melville, and the American Character: A Looking-Glass Business. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984.Google Scholar
McWilliams, John P. Jr “The Rationale for ‘the American Romance.‘” Pease, New Americanists 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, Walter Benn, and Pease, Donald E., eds The American Renaissance Reconsidered: Selected Papers from the English Institute, 1982–83. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis Hawthorne and History: Defacing It. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
Miller, Perry The Raven and the Whale: The War of Words and Wits in the Era of Poe and Melville. New York: Harcourt, 1956.Google Scholar
Pease, Donald E “New Americanists: Revisionist Interventions into the Canon.” Pease, New Americanists 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, Donald E, ed New Americanists: Revisionist Interventions into the Canon. Spec, issue of Boundary 2 17 (1990): 1–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, Donald E Visionary Compacts: American Renaissance Writings in Cultural Context. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1987.Google Scholar
Person, Leland S. Jr “Hester's Revenge: The Power of Silence in The Scarlet Letter.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 43 (1989): 465–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, Richard The Renewal of Literature: Emersonian Reflections. New York: Random, 1987.Google Scholar
Poirier, Richard A World Elsewhere: The Place of Style in American Literature. New York: Oxford UP, 1966.Google Scholar
Porte, Joel The Romance in America: Studies in Cooper, Poe, Hawthorne, Melville, and James. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 1969.Google Scholar
Ragussis, Michael “Family Discourse and Fiction in The Scarlet Letter.” ELH 49 (1982): 863–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reising, Russell J The Unusable Past: Theory and the Study of American Literature. New York: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar
Reynolds, David S Beneath the American Renaissance: The Subversive Imagination in the Age of Emerson and Melville. New York: Knopf, 1988.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Larry J European Revolutions and the American Literary Renaissance. New Haven: Yale UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Sachs, Viola “The Gnosis of Hawthorne and Melville: An Interpretation of The Scarlet Letter and Moby-Dick.” American Quarterly 32 (1980): 139–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, Fred G Desire and the Sign: Nineteenth-Century American Fiction. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Simonson, Harold Peter Radical Discontinuities: American Romanticism and Christian Consciousness. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Tompkins, Jane Sensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction, 1790–1860. New York: Oxford UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society. New York: Viking, 1950.Google Scholar
Waggoner, Hyatt H The Presence of Hawthorne. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Walter, James “The Letter and the Spirit in Hawthorne's Allegory of American Experience.” ESQ: A Journal of the American Renaissance 32 (1986): 35–54.Google Scholar
Weisbuch, Robert Atlantic Double-Cross: American Literature and British Influence in the Age of Emerson. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1986.Google Scholar