Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:18:35.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reading Minor Characters: An English Literary Society and Its Culture of Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Adam Reed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay approaches the cultures of reading anthropologically, drawing on my ethnographic research with the Henry Williamson Society to excavate the ways readers enthusiastically commit to the minor characters of Williamson's novels. It places Alex Woloch's literary analysis of minor characterization in dialogue with the anthropological theory of “distributed agency” developed by Alfred Gell in order to examine the idea of the reader as someone who “gives” and may in turn “receive” attention. The essay asks whether it might be more helpful to conceive of readers’ activities as a form of reading without “culture”—whether plurality, if it must be invoked, might better be located in the dynamism of the reading person.

Type
Special Topic: Cultures of Reading
Information
PMLA , Volume 134 , Issue 1: Special Topic Cultures of Reading , January 2019 , pp. 66 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Cannell, Fenella. “English Ancestors: The Moral Possibilities of Popular Genealogy”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 17, no. 3, 2011, pp. 462–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, Caroline van. Art, Agency and Living Presence: From the Animated Image to the Excessive Object. Leiden UP, 2015.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred. “The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology”. Anthropology, Art, and Aesthetics, edited by Coote, J. and Shelton, A., Clarendon Press, 1992, pp. 40–66.Google Scholar
Henare, Amiria, et al., editors. Introduction. Thinking through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically, Routledge, 2007, pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Claudia. Jane Austen's Cults and Cultures. U of Chicago P, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Adam. “Expanding ‘Henry’: Fiction Reading and Its Artifacts in a British Literary Society”. American Ethnologist, vol. 31, no. 1, Feb. 2004, pp. 111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Adam. 'Henry and I: An Ethnographic Account of Men's Fiction Reading.“ Ethnos, vol. 67, no. 2, 2002, pp. 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Adam. Literature and Agency in English Fiction Reading: A Study of the Henry Williamson Society. Manchester UP/U of Toronto P, 2011.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. Property, Substance and Effect. Cambridge UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Williamson, Henry. A Chronicle of Ancient Sunlight. Macdonald, 1951–69. 15 vols.Google Scholar
Woloch, Alex. The One vs. the Many: Minor Characters and the Space of the Protagonist in the Novel. Princeton UP, 2003.Google Scholar