Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:29:22.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Put God in Your Debt”: Emerson's Economy of Expenditure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Richard A. Grusin*
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

Abstract

Emerson's economic thought has most often been interpreted from the perspective of a Marxist analysis of trade and production. Such a perspective fails to distinguish between the different levels of Emerson's thinking—spiritual, commercial, and natural. Following the logic of symbolic exchange employed as a critique of Marxism by Mauss, Bataille, Baudrillard, and others, this essay argues that Emerson's economy of expenditure not only contradicts the basic premises of Marxist doctrine but also alters our understanding of such fundamental Emersonian concepts as self-reliance and compensation.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 35 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bartram, William. Travels through North and South Carolina. 1791.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927–1939. Trans. Stoekl, Allan et al. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1985.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. The Mirror of Production. Trans. Poster. St, Mark. Louis: Telos, 1975.Google Scholar
Bell, Ian F. A.The Hard Currency of Words: Emerson's Fiscal Metaphor in Nature.ELH 52 (1985): 733–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Jonathan. Emerson on the Soul. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1964.Google Scholar
Cameron, Sharon. “Representing Grief: Emerson's ‘Experience.‘Representations 15 (1986): 1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “From Restricted to General Economy: A Hegelianism without Reserve.” Writing and Difference. Trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1978.Google Scholar
Edmundson, Mark. “Emerson and the Work of Melancholia.” Raritan 6.4 (1987): 120–36.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. The Collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Ed. Spiller, Robert E. et al. 3 vols. to date. Cambridge: Belknap–Harvard UP, 1971-.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. The Letters of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Ed. Rusk, Ralph L. 6 vols. New York: Columbia UP, 1939.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. Works. Ed. Emerson, Edward W. 11 vols. Cambridge: Riverside, 1883.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Michael T. American Romanticism and the Marketplace. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Holy Bible. King James Version. New York: NAL, 1974.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Howard. “The Standard Oil Trust as Emersonian Hero.” Raritan 6.4 (1987): 97119.Google Scholar
Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon, 1955.Google Scholar
Hyde, Lewis. The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property. New York: Vintage, 1983.Google Scholar
Kern, Alexander C.Emerson and Economics.” New England Quarterly 13 (1940): 678–96.10.2307/360066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leverenz, David. “The Politics of Emerson's Man-Making Words.” PMLA 101 (1986): 3856.10.2307/462534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. Cunnison, Ian. New York: Norton, 1967.Google Scholar
Packer, B. L. Emerson's Fall: A New Interpretation of the Major Essays. New York: Continuum, 1982.Google Scholar
Porte, Joel. Representative Man: Ralph Waldo Emerson in His Time. New York: Oxford UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Porter, Carolyn. Seeing and Being: The Plight of the Participant-Observer in Emerson, James, Adams, Faulkner. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Richman, Michele H. Reading Georges Bataille: Beyond the Gift. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1976.Google Scholar
Shell, Marc. Money, Language, and Thought: Literary and Philosophical Economies from the Medieval to the Modern Era. Berkeley: U of California P, 1982.Google Scholar
Thoreau, Henry David. Journal: Volume 1, 1837–1844. Ed. Witherell, Elizabeth Hall et al. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Thoreau, Henry David. Walden. Ed. Shanley, J. Lyndon. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1971.Google Scholar