Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:17:54.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Pedagogical Potential of Interessere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

Any multicultural evaluation of difference— for example, my experience as a professor of Latin American studies in front of American students—should be preceded by a questioning of not only the places but also (and principally) the times of that experience. For me, this questioning refers to the transformations that I underwent on the road from student to professional. I offer some biographical particulars to ensure an accurate interpretation of my reading.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Giorgio, Agamben. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Zygmunt, Bauman. Postmodern Ethics. London: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar
Maurice, Blanchot. “Le demain jouer (sur l'avenir du surréalisme).” Nouvelle revue française 172 (1967): 863–88. Rpt. in L'entretien infini. Paris: Gallimard, 1969.Google Scholar
Maurice, Blanchot. “Tomorrow at Stake.” The Infinite Conversation. Trans. and fwd. Susan Hanson. Theory and History of Lit. 82. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1993. 407–21.Google Scholar
Roger, Caillois. Jeux et Sports. Encyclopédie de la Pléiade. Paris: Gallimard, 1967.Google Scholar
Roger, Caillois. Méduse & Cie. Paris: Gallimard, 1960.Google Scholar
Jean, Franco. The Decline and Fall of the Lettered City: Latin America in the Cold War. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans U.Die Epiphanie der Form.” Tagesspiegel [Berlin] 22 June 2002.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich, Jeffrey, T. Schnapp, Ted Leland, and Rick Schavone. “The Athlete's Body, Lost and Found.” Introduction. The Athlete's Body. Ed. Ryan Johnson and Karen Bergquist. Spec. issue of Stanford Humanities Review 6.2 (1998). 24 Sept. 2003 <http://www.stanford.edu/group/SHR/6-2/html/intro.html>..' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Gumbrecht,+Hans+Ulrich,+Jeffrey,+T.+Schnapp,+Ted+Leland,+and+Rick+Schavone.+“The+Athlete's+Body,+Lost+and+Found.”+Introduction.+The+Athlete's+Body.+Ed.+Ryan+Johnson+and+Karen+Bergquist.+Spec.+issue+of+Stanford+Humanities+Review+6.2+(1998).+24+Sept.+2003+.>Google Scholar
Herschmann, Micael, and Lerner, Kátia. Lance de sorte. O futebol e o jogo do bicho na Belle Époque carioca. Rio de Janeiro: Diadorim, 1993.Google Scholar
Jacques, Lacan. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book 11). New York: Norton, 1998.Google Scholar
Lévinas, Emmanuel. “The Ego and the Totality.” Collected Philosophical Papers. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. “Comparative Literature and Global Citizenship.” Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism. Ed. Bernheimer, Charles. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1995. 5865.Google Scholar
Susan, Sontag. “A Critic at Large. Afterlives: The Case of Machado de Assis.” New Yorker 7 May 1990: 102–08.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valéry, Paul. La jeune Parque. Œuvres complètes. Ed. Hytier, Jean. Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard, 1957. 96110.Google Scholar
Îiïek, Slavoj. “Holding the Place.” Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. By Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, and Îiïek. London: Verso, 2000. 308–29.Google Scholar
Îiïek, Slavoj. “The Undergrowth of Enjoyment: How Popular Culture Can Serve as an Introduction to Lacan.” The Îi-ïek Reader. Ed. Wright, Elizabeth and Wright, Edmond. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. 1136.Google Scholar