Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:54:48.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Threshold of the Realist Novel: Gender and Genre in La gaviota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Susan Kirkpatrick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cecilia Böhl, who wrote under the pseudonym Fernán Caballero, manipulated the fictional forms available to her in an attempt to compensate for or conceal her transgression of the taboo against women writers. In the protagonist of La gaviota she combined types drawn from three genres–the tale of morals, the Romantic novel of the ambitious provincial youth, and Spanish costumbrismo– in an elaborate strategy designed to disavow her identification with her character. In so doing, she constructed a composite fictional discourse that opened the way for the realist novel in Spain. Her anxiety about male-female boundaries, however, extended to generic definitions as well: her static treatment of the fictional modes she brought together prevented her from achieving the fluid, dynamic narrative form that is characteristic of realism.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , May 1983 , pp. 323 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Barthes, Roland. S/Z: An Essay. Trans. Miller, Richard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1974.Google Scholar
Baym, Nina. Woman's Fiction: A Guide to Novels by and about Women in America, 1820–1870. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Caballero, Fernán. La gaviota. Ed. Rodríguez-Luis, Julio. Barcelona: Editorial Labor, 1972.Google Scholar
Carnero, Guillermo. Los origenes del romanticismo reaccionario español: El matrimonio Böhl de Faber. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia, 1978.Google Scholar
Coward, Rosalind, and Ellis, John. Language and Materialism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar
Doody, Margaret Anne. “George Eliot and the Eighteenth-Century Novel.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 35 (1980):260–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, Umberto. “Rhetoric and Ideology in Sue's Les Mystères de Paris.” International Social Science Journal 19 (1967):551–69.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Ferreras, Juan Ignacio. La novela por entregas: 1840–1900. Salamanca: Taurus, 1972.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Herrero, Javier. Fernán Caballero: Un nuevo planteamiento. Madrid: Gredos, 1963.Google Scholar
Jehlen, Myra. “Archimedes and the Paradox of Feminist Criticism.” Signs 6 (1981): 575–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Cora. Introd. Aurora Leigh and Other Poems. By Elizabeth Barrett Browning. London: Woman's Press, 1978, 5–36.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Susan. “The Ideology of Costumbrismo.” Ideologies and Literature 2.7 (1978): 28–44.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Annette. “Introduction to Hélène Cixous's ‘Castration or Decapitation?”‘ Signs 7 (1981):36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. “La Signification du phallus.” In his Ecrits. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1966, 685–96.Google Scholar
Larra, Mariano José de. “Panorama matritense.” In Obras de Mariano José de Larra. Ed. Serrano, Carlos Seco. Madrid: BAE, 1960, 2:238–41.Google Scholar
Lewis, Thomas E. “Notes toward a Theory of the Referent.” PMLA 94 (1979): 459–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Nancy K. “Emphasis Added: Plots and Plausibilities in Women's Fiction.” PMLA 96 (1981):36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moers, Ellen. Literary Women. New York: Doubleday, 1976.Google Scholar
Montesinos, José F. Fernán Caballero: Ensayo de justificatión. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Pitollet, Camille. “Les Premiers Essais littéraires de Fernán Caballero: Documents inédits.” Bulletin Hispanique 9 (1907):286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Luis, Julio. “La gaviota: Fernán Caballero entre romanticismo y realisme” Anales Galdosianos 8 (1973): 123–36.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Toward an Anthropology of Women. Ed. Reiter, Rayna R. London: Monthly Review, 1975, 157–210.Google Scholar
Seco Serrano, Carlos, ed. “Estudio preliminar.” Obras de don Ramón Mesonero Romanos. Madrid: BAE, 1967, 1:i–xcix.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. “Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness.” Critical Inquiry 8 (1981): 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. The Female Imagination. New York: Knopf, 1975.Google Scholar
Valencina, Diego de, ed. Fernán Caballero: Cartas. Madrid: Sucesores de Hernando, 1919.Google Scholar
Varela, José Luis. “Fernán Caballero y el Volksgeist.” Arbor 379–80 (1977): 23–38.Google Scholar
Zavala, Iris. Ideología político en la novela española del siglo XIX. Salamanca: Anaya, 1971.Google Scholar