Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:54:49.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Nature of the Bildungsroman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

The term bildungsroman has long been one of the most problematic entries in the lexicon of literary studies. Although it is often used innocuously, to refer to almost any novel that focuses on the development of a young protagonist, matters look rather different in the more secluded world of academic German departments. Here, the Bildungsroman is the object of fierce debates that illustrate how even such arcane fields as classificatory genre studies tenuously float on ideological undercurrents.

Type
Criticism in Translation
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bakhtin, M. M.The Bildungsroman and Its Significance in the History of Realism (Toward a Historical Typology of the Novel).” Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Trans. McGee, Vern W. Ed. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Austin: U of Texas P, 1986. 1059. Print.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Dilthey. Poetry and Experience. Ed. Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Rodi, Frithjof. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1985. Print. Vol. 5 of Selected Works. 5 vols. 1985.Google Scholar
Todd, Kontje. The German Bildungsroman: History of a National Genre. Columbia: Camden, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Todd, Kontje. Private Lives in the Public Sphere: The German Bildungsroman as Metafiction. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Fritz, Martini. “Der Bildungsroman: Zur Geschichte des Wortes und der Theorie.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift 35.1 (1961): 4463. Rpt. in Selbmann 239–64.Google Scholar
Karl, Morgenstern. “Über das Wesen des Bildungsromans.” Inländisches Museum 1.2 (1820): 4661; 1.3 (1820): 13–27. Rpt. in Selbmann 55–72.Google Scholar
Karl, Morgenstern. “Über den Geist und Zusammenhang einer Reihe philosophischer Romane.” Selbmann 4554.Google Scholar
Sammons, Jeffrey L.The Bildungsroman for Nonspecialists: An Attempt at a Clarification.” Reflection and Action: Essays on the Bildungsroman. Ed. Hardin, James N. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 1991. 2645. Print.Google Scholar
Rolf, Selbmann, ed. Zur Geschichte des Deutschen Bildungsromans. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1988. Print. Wege der Forschung 640.Google Scholar
Süss, Wilhelm. “Karl Morgenstern: Ein Kulturhistorischer Versuch.” Acta et commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis (Dorpatensis) Ser. B 16 (1929): 1160. Print.Google Scholar