Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:35:32.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Old Price Wars: Melodramatizing the Public Sphere in Early-Nineteenth-Century England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Elaine Hadley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Early English stage melodrama was one version of a melodramatic mode that pervaded the nineteenth century in response to the effects of a growing market culture, especially the classificatory procedures of government bureaucracies and the concomitant formation of a class society. By examining the relation between this genre and the rioters who initiated the “Old Price Wars” in Covent Garden Theatre in 1809, I show how melodrama resisted a class society by supporting more traditional status hierarchies. Melodrama represented the contemporary confrontation between these two distinctive forms of social organization as a family conflict that included the audience. By means of climactic moments of audience participation in its plot, melodrama elicited the spectators' recognition of their own familial ties and therefore facilitated a symbolic reunion that both reflected and encouraged the behaviors of the Old Price rioters, who materially resisted the introduction of market relations into the theater.

Type
2. Underwriting Performance: Appropriation, Legitimation, Exchange
Information
PMLA , Volume 107 , Issue 3: Special Topic: On Poetry , May 1992 , pp. 524 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Letter, A. F. Constitutional Review 11 Oct. 1809. Rpt. in Stockdale 2:485–48.Google Scholar
Arnott, James F., and Robinson, John W. English Theatrical Literature, 1559–1900. London: Soc. for Theatre Research, 1970.Google Scholar
Bender, John. Imagining the Penitentiary: Fiction and the Architecture of the Mind in Eighteenth-Century England. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.Google Scholar
Boaden, James. The Life of John Philip Kemble. Collector's edition in Pusey Library, Harvard University. 7 vols. London, 1809.Google Scholar
Bull, John. Covent Garden Theatre: Remarks on the Cause of the Dispute. London, 1809.Google Scholar
Cobbett, William. Political Register 29 Nov. 1806: 837.Google Scholar
Colman, George. Blue Beard. New English Drama. Vol. 21. London, 1823.Google Scholar
A Constant Reader. Letter. Times 13 Oct. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
A Constant Reader. Letter. Times 8 Nov. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Philip, and Sayer, Derek. The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution. London: Blackwood, 1985.Google Scholar
“Covent Garden.” Times 15 Dec. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
“Covent Garden Theatre.” Morning Chronicle 19 Sept. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
“Covent Garden Theatre.” Morning Chronicle 22 Sept. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
“Covent Garden Theatre.” Morning Chronicle 11 Oct. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
“Covent Garden Theatre.” Morning Chronicle 16 Oct. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
Dibdin, Charles. Melodrame Mad! London, 1819.Google Scholar
Dimond, William. Adrian and Orrila. New York, 1807.Google Scholar
An English Gentleman. Letter. Times 7 Nov. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage-Random, 1979.Google Scholar
A Friend to Morality but Not a Member of the Society for the Suppression of Vice. Letter. Morning Chronicle 28 Sept. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: U of California P, 1984.Google Scholar
Gilliland, Thomas. Elbow Room. London, 1804.Google Scholar
Gledhill, Christine. “The Melodramatic Field: An Investigation.” Home Is Where the Hearth Is. Ed. Gledhill, Christine. London: British Film Inst., 1987. 5–42.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Trans. Burger, Thomas. Cambridge: MIT P, 1989.Google Scholar
Harvey, Michael. “The Actor-Audience in Performance of Nineteenth-Century Melodrama.” Unpublished essay, 1990.Google Scholar
Hay, Douglas. “Property, Authority, and the Criminal Law.” Albion's Fatal Tree. Ed. Hay et al. New York: Pantheon, 1975. 17–63.Google Scholar
Holcroft, Thomas. Deaf and Dumb; or, The Orphan Protected. New English Drama. Vol. 6. London, 1819.Google Scholar
Holcroft, Thomas. A Tale of Mystery. London, 1802.Google Scholar
Hook, Theodore Edward. Tekeli; or, The Siege of Montgatz. Cumberland's British Theatre. Vol. 30. London, n.d.Google Scholar
Hughes, Leo. Drama's Patrons. Austin: U of Texas P, 1971.Google Scholar
Letter, J. K. Constitutional Review 28 Sept. 1809. Rpt. in Stockdale 1:70–72.Google Scholar
K. H. and Company. A Genuine Collection of O.P. Songs. London, 1809.Google Scholar
Liesenfeld, Vincent J. The Stage and the Licensing Act. New York: Garland, 1981.Google Scholar
Loraine, J. Letter. Times 20 Oct. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
Mad, Tom. A Series of Letters on the Late Theatric Festival. London, 1810.Google Scholar
Mayer, David III. Harlequin in His Element. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1969.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A. “Cage aux folks: Sensation and Gender in Wilkie Collins's The Woman in White.” The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988. 146–14.Google Scholar
Moore, David C. The Politics of Deference. Hassocks, Eng.: Harvester, 1976.Google Scholar
Morning Post 22 Sept. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
No Votary. Letter. Stockdale 2: 726.Google Scholar
An Old Scene Shifter. Letter. Political Review n.d. Rpt. in Stockdale 2:389–38.Google Scholar
An Old Scene Shifter. Letter. Political Review 21 Sept. 1809. Rpt. in Stockdale 2:411–41.Google Scholar
James, Pauli. Letter. Times 11 Nov. 1806: n. pag.Google Scholar
Reddy, William. Money and Liberty in Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Gillian. “Playing at Revolution: The Politics of the O.P. Riots of 1809.” Theatre Notebook 44 (1990): 16–26.Google Scholar
Stockdale, J. J., ed. The Covent Garden Journal. 2 vols. London, 1810.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare. New York: Weidenfeld, 1989.Google Scholar
Tegg, Thomas. The Rise, Progress and Termination of the O.P. War. London, 1810.Google Scholar
Tetzeli v. Rosador, Kurt. “Victorian Theories of Melodrama.” Anglia 95 (1977): 87–114.Google Scholar
“Theatrical Examiner.” Examiner 24 Sept. 1809: 618.Google Scholar
Times 7 Nov. 1806: n. pag.Google Scholar
The Town. Letter. Morning Chronicle 28 Oct. 1809: n. pag.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prelude. 1850. Selected Poems and Prefaces. Ed. Stillinger, Jack. Boston: Houghton, 1965.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prelude. 1805. William Wordsworth. Ed. Gill, Stephen. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1984.Google Scholar