Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2020
From one standpoint, the major theme of Thomas Hardy's The Mayor of Casterbridge is not “character is fate” or “man against himself,” but rather it is the conflict between generations. This is a very ancient subject matter, one of the archetypal themes noted by the Jungian literary psychologist Maud Bodkin, who traces it in classical Greek drama and in Shakespeare's Hamlet and King Lear? In Hardy's novel the conflicting generations are represented by Michael Henchard, the middle-aged corn factor and mayor, and Donald Farfrae, the energetic young Scotchman whose two-fold abilities, “the commercial and the romantic” (p. 162), while exercised with the best of intentions, prove deadly to his patron. Because of the ineluctability of this theme, it is necessary that the affection between the two men should turn to hate and that Henchard, as the older, should go under. The special bitterness of Henchard's inevitable failure is perhaps Hardy's characteristically pessimistic contribution. But we might also relate this quality of bitterness to the lack—increasingly in Hardy's time and almost totally in ours—of a generally accepted religious outlook which could transform Henchard's sufferings into a mitigating ritual and his death into a sacrificial symbol. Whereas Lear dies in the bosom of his family, as it were, surrounded by both his living and dead relatives, in full view of an awed and edified audience, Henchard's death is hidden from the eyes of all men except the faithful “fool” Whittle, whose report is necessarily limited to a few concrete particulars. Under the circumstances, Elizabeth–Jane's “what bitterness lies there!” (p. 337) is, at least on one level of the narrative, a final comment which every reader must echo.
1 All page references to The Mayor of Casterbridge are to the text ed. published in the series called “Rinehart Editions” by Rinehart & Co. (New York, 1948).
2 See A. J. Guerard, Thomas Hardy: The Novels and Stories (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1949), pp. 146–153, for a psychiatrically oriented discussion of Henchard's self-destructive and masochistic traits.
3 Archetypal Patterns in Poetry (London, 1934), pp. 23–24.
4 Arthur McDowall in his Thomas Hardy (London, 1931), p. 74, describes Farfrae as “the David to Henchard's Saul” but does not go on to develop the point.
5 I make use of the Authorized Version of the Bible for all scriptural citations and references in this essay.
6 Florence Hardy, The Early Life of Thomas Hardy, 1840–1891 (New York, 1928), pp. 222–223.