Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:10:11.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Literacy and Departments of Language and Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

David Bartholomae
David Bartholomae*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As a member of the mla executive Council, I participated in the discussions that led to this conference and felt moved by my colleagues and their sense of urgency, particularly as expressed by Rosemarie Scullion and Sylvia Molloy. At the time of our council meetings, however, I was thinking mostly about staffing issues and the various reports and resolutions related to the use of graduate student and non-tenure-stream labor—some of them useful, some of them not very useful at all. And there I felt a real sense of urgency—and I remember thinking that there might be a way these issues converged.

Type
Shaping Change
Information
PMLA , Volume 117 , Issue 5 , October 2002 , pp. 1272 - 1278
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Berman, Russell A. “Foreign Languages and Foreign Cultures.” ADFL Bulletin 33.2 (2002): 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Final Report of the MLA Committee on Professional Employment.” PMLA 113 (1998): 1154–77.Google Scholar
Godzich, Wlad. The Culture of Literacy. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Holquist, Michael. “Why We Should Remember Philology.” ADFL Bulletin 33.2 (2002): 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Richard. “Reconciling the Language-Literature Split through Literacy.” ADFL Bulletin 33.3 (2002): 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Report of the ADE Ad Hoc Committee on Staffing.” ADE Bulletin 122 (1999): 7–26.Google Scholar